Close Close

Carson Holds 14 Pt. Lead in GOP Caucus

Iowa

Outsider candidates ride voter dissatisfaction with party

West Long Branch, NJ  – The Monmouth University Poll of likely Iowa Republican caucusgoers finds Ben Carson has taken a double digit lead over Donald Trump.  The outsider candidates remain on top amid a prevailing attitude that the national Republican Party has not served its voters well.

When Iowa Republicans are asked who they would support in their local caucus, Ben Carson (32%) tops the list, with Donald Trump (18%) holding second.  In Monmouth’s last poll of GOP caucusgoers in August, the two were tied for the top spot at 23% each.  The next tier of candidates includes Ted Cruz (10%), Marco Rubio (10%), and Jeb Bush (8%).  They are followed by Carly Fiorina (5%), Rand Paul (3%), Mike Huckabee (2%), Bobby Jindal (2%), and John Kasich (2%).  None of the other five candidates tested topped 1%.

Compared to two months ago, Carson is up by 9 points and Rubio is up by 6 points.  Trump has dropped by 5 points and Fiorina’s share of the vote has also decreased by 5 points.  Carson’s support has gone up among all ideological groups.  He now leads Trump by 9 points (31%-22%) among very conservative voters compared to a single point two months ago and by 21 points (39%-18%) among somewhat conservative voters compared to 2 points in August.  He also has a 17 point (29%-12%) lead among moderate to liberal voters, which is a reversal since the prior poll when he trailed Trump by 9 points (17%-26%) among this group.

Carson maintains a 36% to 18% lead over Trump among evangelical Christian voters, which is somewhat larger than the 29% to 23% advantage he held two months ago.  However, Carson also holds a 28% to 19% edge among non-evangelicals, reversing an 18% to 24% deficit in August.  Carson’s 34% to 17% lead over Trump among women is similar to his 30% to 19% advantage two months ago.  He now leads among men as well, 31% to 20%, which wipes out the 17% to 27% deficit he had to Trump in the prior poll.

“Trump’s support has eroded in a number of key areas, with the beneficiary being another outside candidate.  One question is how secure Carson’s new found support really is,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.

Just 1-in-5 (19%) Iowa GOP caucusgoers say they are completely set on their choice, although this is up from 12% two months ago.  Another 43% say they have a strong preference right now, 19% have a slight preference, and 18% are really undecided.  Three-in-ten voters say they would be either very unhappy (11%) or a little unhappy (19%) if their chosen candidate did not win the Republican nomination, but most (52%) would be okay if someone else was the GOP standard bearer.  There are few significant differences in these findings by candidate support.

“While the leaderboard positions have changed, the outsider candidates still dominate this race.  The GOP’s leadership may hope that an establishment figure will emerge, but that may not happen while their voters remain dissatisfied with the party as a whole,” said Murray.

Nearly 6-in-10 (57%) Iowa caucusgoers say that the national Republican Party does a bad job representing the concerns of voters like them.  Just 32% say it does a good job.  Majorities of very conservative (60%), somewhat conservative (56%), and moderate to liberal (52%) voters alike say the national party does a bad job representing them.

The poll found that Ben Carson continues to hold the best voter rating in the field at 84% favorable and 7% unfavorable, which is basically unchanged from August (81% – 6%).  Donald Trump’s rating is 53% favorable and 38% unfavorable.  Trump’s positive rating is basically the same as in August (52%), but his negative rating has increased by 5 points from 33%.

Other candidates with positive voter ratings include Marco Rubio (65% favorable – 16% unfavorable), Carly Fiorina (63% – 18%), Ted Cruz (59% – 24%), Bobby Jindal (56% – 23%), and Mike Huckabee (52% – 33%).  Jeb Bush receives a negative rating of 42% favorable and 46% unfavorable, but that is improved from 32% – 51% two months ago.  Negative ratings are also given to John Kasich (31% – 35%), Rand Paul (32% – 49%), and Chris Christie (30% – 53%).

The Monmouth University Poll  was conducted by telephone from October 22 to 25, 2015 with 400 Iowa voters likely to attend the Republican presidential caucuses in February 2016. This sample has a margin of error of ± 4.9 percent.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.

DATA TABLES

The questions referred to in this release are as follows:

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)

1. Who would you support if the presidential caucus was being held today and the candidates for the Republican nomination were – [NAMES WERE ROTATED]

 Oct.
2015
Aug.
2015
July
2015
Jeb Bush8%5%7%
Ben Carson32%23%8%
Chris Christie1%1%1%
Ted Cruz10%9%7%
Carly Fiorina5%10%3%
Jim Gilmore0%0%0%
Lindsey Graham0%0%0%
Mike Huckabee2%2%6%
Bobby Jindal2%1%4%
John Kasich2%4%2%
George Pataki0%

<1%

<1%

Rand Paul3%3%5%
Marco Rubio10%4%5%
Rick Santorum1%2%3%
Donald Trump18%23%13%
(VOL) Other0%0%0%
Rick Perry

n/a

1%3%
Scott Walker

n/a

7%22%
(VOL) “Uncommitted”1%

n/a

n/a

(VOL) Undecided5%5%11%
(n)400405452

2. And who would be your second choice?

 Oct.
2015
Aug.
2015
July
2015
Jeb Bush5%5%6%
Ben Carson19%12%6%
Chris Christie1%3%2%
Ted Cruz14%13%7%
Carly Fiorina8%8%3%
Jim Gilmore0%0%

<1%

Lindsey Graham

<1%

<1%

<1%

Mike Huckabee2%5%5%
Bobby Jindal6%6%8%
John Kasich1%2%1%
George Pataki0%0%

<1%

Rand Paul

<1%

3%4%
Marco Rubio14%8%9%
Rick Santorum1%1%3%
Donald Trump12%10%9%
(VOL) Other0%0%0%
Rick Perry

n/a

2%5%
Scott Walker

n/a

9%13%
(VOL) No one6%6%4%
(VOL) Undecided9%7%15%
(n)

400

405

452

3. Which of the following best describes where your decision stands at this moment: I am completely decided on which candidate I will support, I have a strong preference right now but I am willing to consider other candidates, I have a slight preference among a group of candidates I like, or I am really undecided among a number of candidates?

 Oct.
2015
Aug.
2015
Completely decided19%12%
Strong preference43%42%
Slight preference19%27%
Undecided18%20%

[QUESTION 4 WAS ASKED OF THOSE WITH A FIRST CHOICE; n=378, moe = +/-5.1%.]

4. How would you feel if someone other than [FIRST VOTE CHOICE] won the Republican nomination – would you be very unhappy, a little unhappy, or would you be okay with it?

 Oct.
2015
Very unhappy11%
A little unhappy19%
Would be okay with it52%
(VOL) Depends on who wins18%
(VOL) Don’t know1%

5. I’m going to read you a few names of people who are running for president in 2016. Please tell me if your general impression of each is favorable or unfavorable, or if you don’t really have an opinion.  [NAMES WERE ROTATED]

 

Favorable

Unfavorable

No opinion

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush

   42%

   46%

   12%

    –August 2015

32

51

17

    –July 2015

40

42

18

Commentator and Doctor Ben Carson

   84%

   7%

   9%

    –August 2015

81

6

14

    –July 2015

63

11

26

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie

   30%

   53%

   18%

    –August 2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

    –July 2015

26

51

23

Texas Senator Ted Cruz

   59%

   24%

   18%

    –August 2015

58

21

21

    –July 2015

53

17

29

Businesswoman Carly Fiorina

   63%

   18%

   19%

    –August 2015

67

8

25

    –July 2015

44

10

46

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee

   52%

   33%

   15%

    –August 2015

53

27

21

    –July 2015

58

23

19

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal

   56%

   23%

   21%

    –August 2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

    –July 2015

59

12

29

Ohio Governor John Kasich

   31%

   35%

   34%

    –August 2015

32

23

45

    –July 2015

24

17

59

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul

   32%

   49%

   19%

    –August 2015

n/a

n/a

n/a

    –July 2015

42

32

26

Florida Senator Marco Rubio

   65%

   16%

   19%

    –August 2015

64

13

23

    –July 2015

64

14

22

Businessman Donald Trump

   53%

   38%

   9%

    –August 2015

52

33

14

    –July 2015

47

35

18

6. Overall, is the national Republican Party doing a good job or bad job representing the concerns of voters like you?

 Oct.
2015
Good job32%
Bad job57%
(VOL) Depends8%
(VOL) Don’t know4%

7. Have you had the opportunity to meet or see any of the Republican or Democratic candidates for president in person this year, or not?

 Oct.
2015
Yes35%
No63%
(VOL) Don’t recall1%

8. If YES: Which ones? [MULTIPLE RESPONSES ACCEPTED.]

 Oct.
2015
Jeb Bush7%
Ben Carson11%
Chris Christie5%
Ted Cruz8%
Carly Fiorina11%
Mike Huckabee10%
Bobby Jindal12%
John Kasich4%
Rand Paul5%
Marco Rubio9%
Donald Trump11%
Scott Walker6%
Lindsey Graham1%
Rick Santorum1%
Rick Perry1%
Hillary Clinton3%
Bernie Sanders2%
Other1%
No one (from Q7)63%
Don’t know1%

The Monmouth University Poll was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from October 22 to 25, 2015 with a statewide random sample of 400 Iowa voters drawn from a list of registered Republican voters who voted in at least one of the last two state primary elections and indicate they are likely to attend the Republican presidential caucuses in February 2016. This includes 262 contacted by a live interviewer on a landline telephone and 138 contacted by a live interviewer on a cell phone, in English.  Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey design, data weighting and analysis. Final sample is weighted for age and gender based on state registration list information on the pool of voters who participate in primary elections. Data collection support provided by Braun Research (field) and Aristotle (voter list). For results based on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 4.9 percentage points (unadjusted for sample design). Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below). In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.

POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)

52% Male7% 18-3455% Evangelical Christian
48% Female18% 35-4945% Not evangelical
 35% 50-64 
 40% 65+ 

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and results by key demographic groups.