{"id":40802236332,"date":"2009-05-26T12:13:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-26T16:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/2009\/05\/26\/if-the-polls-are-to-be-believed\/"},"modified":"2021-01-25T11:22:08","modified_gmt":"2021-01-25T16:22:08","slug":"if-the-polls-are-to-be-believed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/2009\/05\/26\/if-the-polls-are-to-be-believed\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cIf The Polls Are To Be Believed\u2026\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Did you ever notice that polls seem to be subject to more journalistic skepticism than other numbers? Perhaps it\u2019s because there are so many polls available, and of such varying quality, that it\u2019s easy to compare and contrast differences.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, nearly all other statistics \u2013 especially those from \u201cofficial\u201d sources \u2013 are accepted <em>prima facie<\/em>. For example, the media ran unquestioningly with a Social Security Administration story about the dramatic increase in baby boys being named Barack, although <a href=\"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/2009\/05\/08\/barack-baby-boom-bupkus\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a simple journalistic inquiry would have quickly deflated that claim<\/a>. Also, every press story about autism in New Jersey now includes the tag that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nj.com\/parenting\/carrie_stetler\/index.ssf\/2009\/05\/autism_insurance_bill_passed_b.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">New Jersey has the highest autism rate in the nation<\/a>. However, this claim is based on a study that was done, not nationally, but in only 14 states \u2013 and even the comparability of those state results is suspect. <em>(I\u2019ll be blogging more about this issue in a few weeks.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Not that I\u2019m arguing for less scrutiny of polls \u2013 far from it. My main concern is that while basic questions about all numbers go unasked before being reported to the public, it seems that only with polls do the media express doubt on the veracity of the numbers they themselves report, many times with banner headlines.<\/p>\n<p>On NJN\u2019s <em>Reporters Roundtable<\/em> this past weekend, one panelist after another \u2013 including a reporter from Monmouth\u2019s own media partner \u2013 used the phrase, \u201cif the polls are to be believed.\u201d They were discussing the New Jersey GOP gubernatorial primary and, specifically, Chris Christie\u2019s large lead over Steve Lonegan in polls released by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_042909\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Monmouth\/Gannett<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/poll.qu.edu\/poll-release?ReleaseID=1288&amp;What=&amp;strArea=4;0;&amp;strTime=28\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Quinnipiac<\/a> last week.<\/p>\n<p>Skepticism of election polls \u2013 as with any number provided for public consumption \u2013 is extremely healthy. Polls are designed to capture a snapshot of attitudes and behaviors at the time they are taken. And indeed, we tend to see a lot of consistency among reliable polls on \u201chere-and-now\u201d measures (e.g. a politician\u2019s job performance rating). However, polls are imperfect tools when asked to predict the future, such as an election outcome. Yet they work reasonably well and are the best tools we\u2019ve got \u2013 so we use them.<\/p>\n<p>What concerns me about the \u201cif polls are to be believed\u201d line is that there tends to be little discernment about why one should or shouldn\u2019t believe the polls. And that\u2019s because there is a tendency to evaluate election polls only in their capacity to predict outcomes. Among the five journalists on <em>RR<\/em>, I recall only one actually discussing a poll finding other than the top-line \u201chorse race\u201d results.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s such a media fascination with the horse race numbers that it\u2019s easy to shoot down polls as insubstantial, if in fact that was all the polls were asking about. However, some polls actually do strive to go beyond the vote intention question to understand the dynamics of the electorate.<\/p>\n<p>Monmouth\/Gannett\u2019s GOP primary poll included 19 questions about the campaign. But media outlets tended to report only the horse race results, or at most, the results of one or two additional questions.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the poll included a wealth of information that could help shape media coverage of the campaign and indeed make that coverage more relevant to voters\u2019 actual concerns. For example, in poll after poll, property taxes is named by New Jersey voters as the number one issue they want to hear the gubernatorial candidates talk about. However, less than half of the GOP primary electorate say they have heard any of the candidates articulate a plan on this issue, or indeed on just about any of the issues voters consider to be important.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the media could better serve its readers and viewers by pressing the candidates more to address these issues rather than focus on horse race and strategy. That is, of course, if the polls are to be believed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Did you ever notice that polls seem to be subject to more journalistic skepticism than other numbers? Perhaps it\u2019s because there are so many polls available, and of such varying quality, that it\u2019s easy to compare and contrast differences. On the other hand, nearly all other statistics \u2013 especially those from \u201cofficial\u201d sources \u2013 are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":939,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40802236332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40802236332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/939"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40802236332"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40802236332\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802237141,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40802236332\/revisions\/40802237141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802236332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40802236332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40802236332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}