{"id":40802236044,"date":"2012-02-05T15:21:00","date_gmt":"2012-02-05T20:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/2012\/02\/05\/what-we-learned-from-nevada\/"},"modified":"2021-01-25T11:22:05","modified_gmt":"2021-01-25T16:22:05","slug":"what-we-learned-from-nevada","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/2012\/02\/05\/what-we-learned-from-nevada\/","title":{"rendered":"What We Learned from Nevada"},"content":{"rendered":"

Cross-posted at PolitickerNJ<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

[Acknowledgements: Some of the data for this analysis was made available by NBC News, where I was an entrance poll analyst on caucus night.]<\/em><\/p>\n

As I write this \u2013 more than 12 hours after the final caucus concluded \u2013 over one quarter of Nevada\u2019s votes remain to be tallied. I\u2019m guessing that Chumlee of \u201cPawn Stars\u201d fame has been put in charge of the Clark County vote count operation.<\/p>\n

Even so, we know the basic results from Saturday.  And they have raised some new talking points among pundits. Are strong conservatives becoming more comfortable with Mitt Romney And can we glean anything from these results about how he would fare in a general election?<\/p>\n

Even though the final vote totals aren\u2019t in, the entrance poll gives some insight on emerging trends that have an impact on front-runner Mitt Romney.<\/p>\n

Conservatives and Evangelicals<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nevada\u2019s caucuses saw the highest proportion of voters calling themselves very conservative.  Nearly half \u2013 49% \u2013 described themselves that way, which is comparable to Iowa (47%) but much higher than South Carolina (36%), Florida (33%), and New Hampshire (21%).<\/p>\n

Romney lost these voters in Iowa, South Carolina and Florida. He had a nominal win among the smaller group of very conservative voters in New Hampshire. But in Nevada, he racked up nearly half of this group\u2019s vote \u2013 46% to 25% for New Gingrich.<\/p>\n

So what was different about Nevada\u2019s very conservative voters? On the whole, not much. They look the same as very conservative voters in the other four states both demographically (age, gender, income, etc.) and in terms of issues and candidate quality preferences. The single area where the Silver State\u2019s conservative bloc differs from prior contests is the significantly lower proportion of evangelical voters.<\/p>\n

In fact, Nevada\u2019s caucuses saw the second smallest proportion of voters who described themselves as Evangelical Christians. It was 28% there, compared to 64% in South Carolina, 57% in Iowa, and 47% in Florida. Only New Hampshire was lower at 22%.<\/p>\n

Of course one of the reasons for the low evangelical total in Nevada is the high number of Mormons. More than 1-in-4 caucus goers belong to the same faith as Mitt Romney. In the four prior contests, Mormons numbered only 1%. As expected they went overwhelmingly for Romney \u2013 about 9-in-10.<\/p>\n

Both Mormons and Catholics are much less likely than Protestants and other Christians to call themselves \u201cborn again.\u201d Mormons and Catholics combined made up 46% of the Republican electorate in Nevada, 36% in New Hampshire, and 33% in Florida \u2013 the states that Romney won so far. These two denominations accounted for only 14% of voters in South Carolina, where Gingrich was the victor. (The Iowa entrance poll did not include data on religion.)<\/p>\n

The importance of this is that there exists a correlation between being a strong conservative and being evangelical. In states where Romney did poorly with conservatives, the exit polls suggest that it had less to do with his experience and issue positions and more to do with his religion. It seems that concerns about Romney\u2019s faith continue to occupy the minds of many GOP voters. This will be important to watch in heavily evangelical Protestant states, particularly in the South.<\/p>\n

The Rich Thing<\/strong><\/p>\n

The exit polls in the five nomination contests held so far show a significant wealth gap in Mitt Romney\u2019s support. In the three states he won, Romney garnered between 48% and 58% support levels among Republican voters earning more than $100,000 a year. And his share was even higher among those who earn over $200,000.<\/p>\n

More importantly, Romney did worse among voters earning below $30,000 than he did among the wealthiest voters in all five states contested so far. The gap in his support between high earners and low earners was 5 points in South Carolina, 10 points in Florida, 17 points in New Hampshire, 21 points in Iowa, and a whopping 29 points in Nevada.<\/p>\n

It seems that inartful comments about the poor and firing people, not to mention Donald Trump\u2019s endorsement, has done nothing to help Romney close this \u201cwealth gap\u201d among GOP voters. If anything, it may have been exacerbated by these missteps.<\/p>\n

The take away from Nevada is this. If Mitt Romney can navigate around the evangelical vote to win the GOP nomination, a key task in November will be to convince less affluent independent voters that he is on their side. So far, he has not been able to seal that deal with lower income voters from his own party.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cross-posted at PolitickerNJ [Acknowledgements: Some of the data for this analysis was made available by NBC News, where I was an entrance poll analyst on caucus night.] As I write this \u2013 more than 12 hours after the final caucus concluded \u2013 over one quarter of Nevada\u2019s votes remain to be tallied. I\u2019m guessing that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":939,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40802236044","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40802236044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/939"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40802236044"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40802236044\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802244228,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40802236044\/revisions\/40802244228"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802236044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40802236044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40802236044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}