{"id":40802252569,"date":"2022-08-03T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-08-03T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/?post_type=poll&p=40802252569"},"modified":"2022-08-03T09:43:47","modified_gmt":"2022-08-03T13:43:47","slug":"monmouthpoll_us_080322","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_us_080322\/","title":{"rendered":"Dems Gain Slightly in Congress Support"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

West Long Branch, NJ<\/em> \u2013 The latest Monmouth <\/em><\/strong>(<\/em><\/strong>\u201cMon-muth\u201d<\/em><\/strong>) <\/em><\/strong>University Poll<\/em><\/strong> finds the Democrats making small gains in preference for Congressional control and the year-long slide in President Joe Biden\u2019s job rating appears to have stabilized. The economy remains a driving force in the midterm elections, but it is not the only issue of importance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Democrats have made slight gains in the public\u2019s preference for party control of Congress since the spring. Currently, 38% of Americans say they want the Democratic Party in charge and another 12% have no initial preference but lean toward Democratic control. Republican control is preferred by 34% with another 9% leaning toward the GOP. The combined 50% who choose the Democrats is up from 47% in June and 44% in May. Republicans\u2019 43% support level is down from 47% in June and 48% in May.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Nearly 6 in 10 (57%) Americans say it is very important to have their preferred party in control of Congress. The congressional control importance metric is slightly higher among those who want Democrats (63%) than those who want Republicans (59%) leading Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cRecent events, such as the Jan. 6th committee hearings and Supreme Court decisions, seem to have generated a bit more energy for the Democrats, but it is not clear that this is actual momentum. It may simply be ongoing volatility in a public largely unhappy with the way things are going in Washington,\u201d said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overall, Congress earns a dismal 17% approve and 74% disapprove job rating, which is in line with the range for this rating over the past year. Expectations that party control will impact legislative output are positive but muted. Specifically, among those who prefer Democrats, 28% say that retaining their party\u2019s control makes it very likely that Congress will be able to make substantial progress on the issues that are most important to them, while another 51% of this group say a Democratic Congress is somewhat likely to make progress. Among those who prefer Republicans in charge, 33% say that the GOP winning control makes it very likely that Congress will be able to make substantial progress on the issues that are most important to them, while another 48% of this group say a Republican Congress is somewhat likely to make progress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cVoters\u2019 are relatively, if not overwhelmingly, optimistic about making progress under their preferred party\u2019s leadership. However, given the current Congressional job rating, it seems just as likely that whoever is in charge is destined to fall short of expectations,\u201d said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll asked Americans to rate how seven different policy areas factor into their congressional vote choice. About 2 in 3 or more say it is very or extremely important to them that their chosen candidate shares their views on six of these issues. These results are similar to poll findings from three months ago, although the weight given to gun control policy has risen by 10 points (from 66% extremely\/very important in May to 76% now). Looking at just those who rate these policies as extremely important<\/em> finds a fairly even distribution among gun control (38%), health care (37%), abortion (35%), and economic policy (33%), followed by immigration (26%) and tax policy (26%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The current poll included a new policy area in the list \u2013 climate change. This issue is not as much of a factor in Americans\u2019 candidate support as the other six. Just over half of the public says this issue is either extremely (27%) or very (27%) important in their vote choice. There is, however, a huge partisan difference in the weight given to this issue. In fact, it is the widest partisan gap for any of the seven policy areas covered in the poll. Among Democrats, climate change (43% extremely) is nearly as important as health care (48%), abortion (46%), and gun control (45%). On the other hand, only 12% of Republicans say climate policy is extremely important to their vote, far less than say the same for immigration (40%), economic issues (37%), tax policy (36%), and gun control (32%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When asked to choose the single most important issue from the seven policy areas included in the poll, economic policy (24%) is the top concern among all Americans, followed by abortion (17%), gun control (17%), and health care (14%). Climate change (11%), immigration (8%), and tax policy (7%) round out the list. Abortion as the top issue has declined by 8 percentage points since Monmouth\u2019s May poll, which was taken in the immediate wake of the leaked Dobbs decision. This decline in importance has occurred among Democrats, Republicans, and independents alike. However, abortion is still seen as being more important now than it was in the last midterm cycle, according to an August 2018<\/a> Monmouth poll. Republicans\u2019 top midterm issue \u2013 albeit with only 32% in the poll \u2013 is economic policy, followed by immigration (18%) and gun control (15%). Democrats\u2019 top issue concerns are even more evenly spread among abortion (24%), climate change (20%), gun control (19%), and health care (18%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe state of the economy is certainly going to be omnipresent in the election, but Democrats may have a harder time motivating their base in part because of the wider range of priorities among their voters\u201d said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The downward trend in President Biden\u2019s job rating appears to have stabilized for now. Currently, 38% approve of the job he is doing while 56% disapprove. In June, he held a 36% approve and 58% disapprove rating. Biden last held a net positive rating in July 2021 (48% approve and 44% disapprove).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Negative views of the U.S. Supreme Court continue to rise, with 37% of the public saying they approve of the job the court is doing and 59% saying they disapprove. The disapproval number has increased steadily from 42% in March, 52% in May, and 53% in June. Six years ago, only one-third (33%) of Americans disapproved of the job the Supreme Court was doing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just 15% of Americans say the country is headed in the right direction, which is actually an uptick from the record low 10% recorded in June. This shift is due mainly to a relatively better outlook among Democrats (32% right direction, up from 18% in June). However, 8 in 10 Americans (82%) still say the country has gotten off on the wrong track.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was conducted by telephone from July 28 to August 1, 2022 with 808 adults in the United States.  The question results in this release have a margin of error of +\/- 3.5 percentage points. The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

QUESTIONS AND RESULTS      <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span>Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as president?<\/span><\/p>\n\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td>		June
2022<\/td>		May
2022<\/td>		March
2022<\/td>		Jan.
2022<\/td>		Dec.
2021<\/td>		Nov.
2021<\/td>		Sept.
2021<\/td>		July
2021<\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021<\/td>		March
2021<\/td>		Jan.
2021<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/td>38%<\/td>39%<\/td>39%<\/td>40%<\/td>42%<\/td>46%<\/td>48%<\/td>48%<\/td>54%<\/td>51%<\/td>54%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>56%<\/strong><\/td>58%<\/td>57%<\/td>54%<\/td>54%<\/td>50%<\/td>50%<\/td>46%<\/td>44%<\/td>43%<\/td>41%<\/td>42%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>7%<\/strong><\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>7%<\/td>7%<\/td>11%<\/td>9%<\/td>8%<\/td>8%<\/td>9%<\/td>5%<\/td>8%<\/td>16%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(978)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td>(794)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/td>(811)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

2.<\/span>Do you approve or disapprove of the job the U.S. Congress is doing?<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td>		June
2022<\/td>		May
2022<\/td>		March
2022<\/td>		Jan.
2022<\/td>		Dec.
2021<\/td>		Nov.
2021<\/td>		Sept.
2021<\/td>		July
2021<\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021<\/td>		March
2021<\/td>		Jan.
2021<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>17%<\/strong><\/td>15%<\/td>15%<\/td>21%<\/td>19%<\/td>23%<\/td>18%<\/td>22%<\/td>23%<\/td>21%<\/td>35%<\/td>30%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>74%<\/strong><\/td>78%<\/td>77%<\/td>71%<\/td>74%<\/td>66%<\/td>70%<\/td>65%<\/td>62%<\/td>65%<\/td>56%<\/td>59%<\/td>51%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>7%<\/td>8%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>11%<\/td>12%<\/td>13%<\/td>15%<\/td>15%<\/td>9%<\/td>11%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(978)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td>(794)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/td>(811)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:
Continued<\/em><\/td>
Nov.
2020<\/td>		Early June
2020<\/td>
May
2020<\/td>
April
2020<\/td>
Feb.
2020<\/td>
Jan.
2020<\/td>
Dec.
2019<\/td>
Nov.
2019<\/td>
Sept.
2019<\/td>
Aug.
2019<\/td>
June
2019<\/td>
May
2019<\/td>
April
2019<\/td>
March
2019<\/td>
Jan.
2019<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>23%<\/td>22%<\/td>32%<\/td>32%<\/td>20%<\/td>24%<\/td>22%<\/td>23%<\/td>21%<\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>20%<\/td>24%<\/td>23%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>64%<\/td>69%<\/td>55%<\/td>55%<\/td>69%<\/td>62%<\/td>65%<\/td>64%<\/td>68%<\/td>71%<\/td>69%<\/td>71%<\/td>62%<\/td>68%<\/td>72%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>13%<\/td>9%<\/td>13%<\/td>13%<\/td>11%<\/td>14%<\/td>13%<\/td>13%<\/td>11%<\/td>13%<\/td>12%<\/td>9%<\/td>14%<\/td>9%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/td>(857)<\/em><\/td>(902)<\/em><\/td>(903)<\/em><\/td>(903)<\/em><\/td>(908)<\/em><\/td>(1,161)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(751)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:
Continued<\/em><\/td>		Nov.
2018<\/td>		Aug.
2018<\/td>		June
2018<\/td>		April
2018<\/td>		March
2018<\/td>		Jan.
2018<\/td>		Dec.
2017<\/td>		Sept.
2017<\/td>		Aug.
2017<\/td>		July
2017<\/td>		May
2017<\/td>		March
2017<\/td>		Jan.
2017<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>23%<\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>17%<\/td>18%<\/td>21%<\/td>16%<\/td>17%<\/td>18%<\/td>19%<\/td>19%<\/td>25%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>63%<\/td>69%<\/td>67%<\/td>71%<\/td>72%<\/td>68%<\/td>65%<\/td>69%<\/td>69%<\/td>70%<\/td>68%<\/td>59%<\/td>66%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>14%<\/td>14%<\/td>14%<\/td>12%<\/td>11%<\/td>11%<\/td>19%<\/td>15%<\/td>13%<\/td>11%<\/td>13%<\/td>16%<\/td>11%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(1,009)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(1,002)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:
Continued<\/em><\/td>		Sept.
2016*<\/td>		Aug.
2016*<\/td>		June
2016*<\/td>		March
2016<\/td>		Jan.
2016<\/td>		Dec.
2015<\/td>		Oct.
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2015<\/td>		Aug.
2015<\/td>		July
2015<\/td>		June
2015<\/td>		April
2015<\/td>		Jan.
2015<\/td>		Dec.
2014<\/td>		July
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>15%<\/td>14%<\/td>17%<\/td>22%<\/td>17%<\/td>16%<\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>18%<\/td>18%<\/td>19%<\/td>21%<\/td>18%<\/td>17%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>77%<\/td>78%<\/td>76%<\/td>68%<\/td>73%<\/td>73%<\/td>71%<\/td>71%<\/td>72%<\/td>69%<\/td>71%<\/td>67%<\/td>70%<\/td>73%<\/td>76%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>8%<\/td>9%<\/td>7%<\/td>10%<\/td>10%<\/td>10%<\/td>12%<\/td>11%<\/td>11%<\/td>12%<\/td>10%<\/td>12%<\/td>11%<\/td>11%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(1,008)<\/em><\/td>(1,003)<\/em><\/td>(1,006)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td>(1,009)<\/em><\/td>(1,203)<\/em><\/td>(1,001)<\/em><\/td>(1,002)<\/em><\/td>(1,005)<\/em><\/td>(1,003)<\/em><\/td>(1,008)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

        * Registered voters <\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

3.<\/span>Would you rather see the Republicans or the Democrats in control of Congress, or doesn\u2019t this matter to you? [CHOICES WERE ROTATED] [If DOES NOT MATTER: If you had to lean one way or the other would you pick the Republicans or the Democrats?]<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td>		June
2022<\/td>		May
2022<\/td>		March
2022<\/td>		Jan.
2022<\/td><\/tr>
Republicans<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/td>36%<\/td>33%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
Not matter, but lean Rep<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>11%<\/td>12%<\/td>12%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
Democrats<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>38%<\/td>34%<\/td>33%<\/td>33%<\/td><\/tr>
Not matter, but lean Dem<\/td>12%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>10%<\/td>13%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
Does not matter, no lean<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>6%<\/td>7%<\/td>9%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>1%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(978)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td>(794)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span>Is it very important, somewhat important, or only a little important to have [Republicans\/Democrats] in control of Congress? [CHOICE READ FROM Q3]<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td>		June
2022<\/td>		May
2022<\/td>		March
2022<\/td>		Jan.
2022<\/td><\/tr>
Very important<\/td>57%<\/strong><\/td>60%<\/td>59%<\/td>56%<\/td>54%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat important<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/td>20%<\/td>21%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
Only a little important<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td>11%<\/td>12%<\/td>12%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know \/ Does not matter <\/em>
who controls Congress (from Q3)<\/em><\/td>		7%<\/em><\/strong><\/td>9%<\/em><\/td>9%<\/em><\/td>11%<\/em><\/td>8%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(978)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td>(794)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

5.<\/span>If the [Republicans win\/Democrats keep] control of Congress, how likely is it that they will be able to make substantial progress on the issues most important to you \u2013 very likely, somewhat likely, not too likely, or not at all likely? [CHOICE READ FROM Q3]<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Very likely<\/td>28%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat likely<\/td>46%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Not too likely<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Not at all likely<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know \/ Does not matter <\/em>
who controls Congress (from Q3)<\/em><\/td>		9%<\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

6.<\/span>I\u2019m going to read you a number of different policy issues. For each one, please tell me how important it is that a candidate for Congress shares your views on that issue in order for you to vote for them. You may use extremely important, very important, just somewhat important, or not important. [ITEMS WERE ROTATED]<\/span><\/p>\n

Immigration policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td>		May
2022<\/td>		Aug.
2018<\/td><\/tr>
Extremely important<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>33%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
Very important<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>37%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
Just somewhat important<\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td>26%<\/td>21%<\/td><\/tr>
Not important<\/td>6%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>0%<\/strong><\/td>0%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Health care policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td>		May
2022<\/td>		Aug.
2018<\/td><\/tr>
Extremely important<\/td>37%<\/strong><\/td>30%<\/td>43%<\/td><\/tr>
Very important<\/td>39%<\/strong><\/td>42%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Just somewhat important<\/td>21%<\/strong><\/td>22%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
Not important<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>0%<\/strong><\/td>0%<\/td>0%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Gun control policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
\n2022<\/strong><\/td>		May
\n2022<\/td>		Aug.
\n2018<\/td><\/tr>
Extremely important<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>32%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Very important<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>34%<\/td>38%<\/td><\/tr>
Just somewhat important<\/td>14%<\/strong><\/td>21%<\/td>16%<\/td><\/tr>
Not important<\/td>10%<\/strong><\/td>12%<\/td>8%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>0%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Abortion policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
\n2022<\/strong><\/td>		May
\n2022<\/td>		Aug.
\n2018<\/td><\/tr>
Extremely important<\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/td>31%<\/td><\/tr>
Very important<\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/td>28%<\/td><\/tr>
Just somewhat important<\/td>19%<\/strong><\/td>19%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr>
Not important<\/td>12%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>1%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Tax policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
\n2022<\/strong><\/td>		May
\n2022<\/td>		Aug.
\n2018<\/td><\/tr>
Extremely important<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>24%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
Very important<\/td>44%<\/strong><\/td>46%<\/td>44%<\/td><\/tr>
Just somewhat important<\/td>25%<\/strong><\/td>26%<\/td>22%<\/td><\/tr>
Not important<\/td>4%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>0%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Economic policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
\n2022<\/strong><\/td>		May
\n2022<\/td>		Aug.
\n2018<\/td><\/tr>
Extremely important<\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>31%<\/td>31%<\/td><\/tr>
Very important<\/td>45%<\/strong><\/td>48%<\/td>48%<\/td><\/tr>
Just somewhat important<\/td>19%<\/strong><\/td>19%<\/td>17%<\/td><\/tr>
Not important<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>0%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Climate change policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Extremely important<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Very important<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Just somewhat important<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Not important<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>0%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

7.<\/span>And which of the issues I just mentioned is most important to you in your vote choice for Congress?<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td>		May
2022<\/td>		Aug.
2018<\/td><\/tr>
Immigration policy<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>14%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr>
Health care policy<\/td>14%<\/strong><\/td>16%<\/td>28%<\/td><\/tr>
Gun control policy<\/td>17%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr>
Abortion policy<\/td>17%<\/strong><\/td>25%<\/td>9%<\/td><\/tr>
Tax policy<\/td>7%<\/strong><\/td>8%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
Economic policy<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>26%<\/td>19%<\/td><\/tr>
Climate change policy<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

8.<\/span>Would you say things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they gotten off on the wrong track?<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>Aug.
2022<\/strong><\/td>		June
2022<\/td>		May
2022<\/td>		March
2022<\/td>		Jan.
2022<\/td>		Dec.
2021<\/td>		Nov.
2021<\/td>		Sept.
2021<\/td>		July
2021<\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021<\/td>		March
2021<\/td>		Jan.
2021<\/td><\/tr>
Right direction<\/td>15%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/td>18%<\/td>24%<\/td>24%<\/td>30%<\/td>31%<\/td>29%<\/td>38%<\/td>37%<\/td>46%<\/td>34%<\/td>42%<\/td><\/tr>
Wrong track<\/td>82%<\/strong><\/td>88%<\/td>79%<\/td>73%<\/td>71%<\/td>66%<\/td>64%<\/td>65%<\/td>56%<\/td>57%<\/td>50%<\/td>61%<\/td>51%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>1%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(978)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td>(794)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/td>(811)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:
Continued<\/em><\/td>		Nov.
2020<\/td>		Early Sept.
2020<\/td>		Aug.
2020<\/td>		Late June
2020<\/td>		Early June
2020<\/td>		May
2020<\/td>		April
2020<\/td>		March
2020<\/td>		Feb.
2020<\/td>		Jan.
2020<\/td><\/tr>
Right direction<\/td>26%<\/td>27%<\/td>22%<\/td>18%<\/td>21%<\/td>33%<\/td>30%<\/td>39%<\/td>37%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Wrong track<\/td>68%<\/td>66%<\/td>72%<\/td>74%<\/td>74%<\/td>60%<\/td>61%<\/td>54%<\/td>57%<\/td>56%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(867)<\/em><\/td>(868)<\/em><\/td>(867)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/td>(857)<\/em><\/td>(851)<\/em><\/td>(902)<\/em><\/td>(903)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:
Continued<\/em><\/td>		Dec.
2019<\/td>		Nov.
2019<\/td>		Sept.
2019<\/td>		Aug.
2019<\/td>		June
2019<\/td>		May
2019<\/td>		April
2019<\/td>		March
2019<\/td>		Nov.
2018<\/td>		Aug.
2018<\/td>		June
2018<\/td>		April
2018<\/td>		March
2018<\/td>		Jan.
2018<\/td><\/tr>
Right direction<\/td>32%<\/td>30%<\/td>30%<\/td>28%<\/td>31%<\/td>29%<\/td>28%<\/td>29%<\/td>35%<\/td>35%<\/td>40%<\/td>33%<\/td>31%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Wrong track<\/td>56%<\/td>61%<\/td>61%<\/td>62%<\/td>62%<\/td>63%<\/td>62%<\/td>63%<\/td>55%<\/td>57%<\/td>53%<\/td>58%<\/td>61%<\/td>57%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>8%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>6%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/td>(903)<\/em><\/td>(908)<\/em><\/td>(1,161)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(751)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:
Continued<\/em><\/td>		Dec.
2017<\/td>		Aug.
2017<\/td>		May
2017<\/td>		March
2017<\/td>		Jan.
2017<\/td>		Aug.
2016*<\/td>		Oct.
2015<\/td>		July
2015<\/td>		June
2015<\/td>		April
2015<\/td>		Dec.
2014<\/td>		July
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Right direction<\/td>24%<\/td>32%<\/td>31%<\/td>35%<\/td>29%<\/td>30%<\/td>24%<\/td>28%<\/td>23%<\/td>27%<\/td>23%<\/td>28%<\/td><\/tr>
Wrong track<\/td>66%<\/td>58%<\/td>61%<\/td>56%<\/td>65%<\/td>65%<\/td>66%<\/td>63%<\/td>68%<\/td>66%<\/td>69%<\/td>63%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>7%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td>(1,002)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td>(1,001)<\/em><\/td>(1,002)<\/em><\/td>(1,005)<\/em><\/td>(1,008)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

        <\/em>* Registered voters<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

9.<\/span>Do you approve or disapprove of the job the U.S. Supreme Court is doing?<\/span><\/p>\n
TREND:<\/td>Aug.<\/strong>
2022<\/strong><\/td>		June
2022<\/span><\/td>		May
2022<\/span><\/td>		March
2022<\/span><\/td>		Sept.
2021<\/span><\/td>		March
2016<\/span><\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>37%<\/strong><\/td>41%<\/td>38%<\/td>42%<\/td>42%<\/td>49%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>59%<\/strong><\/td>53%<\/td>52%<\/td>42%<\/td>45%<\/td>33%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>7%<\/td>10%<\/td>16%<\/td>12%<\/td>17%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(747)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(1,008)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Q10-22 held for future release.<\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

METHODOLOGY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from July 28 to August 1, 2022 with a probability-based national random sample of 808 adults age 18 and older. This includes 286 contacted by a live interviewer on a landline telephone and 522 contacted by a live interviewer on a cell phone, in English. Telephone numbers were selected through a mix of random digit dialing and list-based sampling. Landline respondents were selected with a modified Troldahl-Carter youngest adult household screen. Interviewing services were provided by Braun Research, with sample obtained from Dynata (RDD, n=492), Aristotle (list, n=135) and a panel of prior Monmouth poll participants (n=181). Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey design, data weighting and analysis. The full sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information (ACS 2018 one-year survey). For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points (unadjusted for sample design). Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below). In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nDEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Self-Reported<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
26% Republican<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
45% Independent<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
29% Democrat<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td><\/tr>
49% Male<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
51% Female<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td><\/tr>
30% 18-34<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
33% 35-54<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
37% 55+<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td><\/tr>
63% White<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
12% Black<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
16% Hispanic<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
  9% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td><\/tr>
69% No degree<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
31% 4 year degree<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and crosstabs by key demographic groups.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Midterm issue picture largely unchanged; Biden rating stabilizes<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802252624,"template":"","geography":[18],"class_list":["post-40802252569","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-national"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802252569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802252569\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802252651,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802252569\/revisions\/40802252651"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802252624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802252569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802252569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}