{"id":40802249489,"date":"2021-07-29T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-07-29T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/?post_type=poll&p=40802249489"},"modified":"2021-07-29T10:57:13","modified_gmt":"2021-07-29T14:57:13","slug":"monmouthpoll_us_072921","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_us_072921\/","title":{"rendered":"Biden Impact on Rich, Poor, Middle Class"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

West Long Branch, NJ<\/em> \u2013 Most Americans say President Joe Biden\u2019s policies are benefiting the rich, poor, and middle class alike, although few say he is providing a lot of help to any of these groups. The latest Monmouth <\/em><\/strong>(<\/em><\/strong>\u201cMon-muth\u201d<\/em><\/strong>) <\/em><\/strong>University Poll<\/em><\/strong> finds that Covid has declined as a top-of-mind worry for American families, with many focusing more on specific financial concerns. The public is somewhat divided on whether the federal government will help or hurt them in the coming years, although clear majorities continue to support the president\u2019s big spending plans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Monmouth periodically asks poll participants to name the biggest concern facing their own family right now. The pandemic dominated responses to this question in polls taken last year \u2013 57% named coronavirus or Covid as their family\u2019s top concern in March 2020 and 39% said the same in August. However, those naming the pandemic as their most pressing worry has now dropped to 17% of the public. Democrats (29%) are more likely than Republicans (13%) and independents (10%) to name this as their top concern, but the differences among other demographic categories (such as age, race, or income) are not sizable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Other top family concerns named in the poll span a range of issues, including everyday bills (11%), the economy (11%), health care costs (7%), job security (7%), and inflation (5%). When concerns about financial expenses (such as bills, health care, school, housing, retirement savings, and inflation) are combined, independents (36%) are more likely than either Republicans (25%) or Democrats (22%) to name one of these issues as their top concern.  However, Republicans and independents are more likely than Democrats to name everyday bills or inflation as their top concern, while Democrats and independents are more likely than Republicans to name health care or housing expenses as their top concern.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAs of the time the poll was taken, America had been turning its focus away from the pandemic as an overriding factor in American life. Specific bread-and-butter issues are now reemerging as top concerns, which means the public\u2019s attention would be on more individualized policy areas. Of course, this appears to be the point of proposing mega-sized spending plans,\u201d said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among poll participants who name a top concern, 31% say the actions of the federal government over the past six months have helped them with this issue, 34% say the federal government has hurt them, and 31% say it has had no impact on this concern. These numbers are better than a poll taken midway through former President Donald Trump\u2019s term when 18% (April 2019) said the federal government had helped them over the prior year, but they are similar to a January 2017 poll when 27% said they were helped by the federal government in the prior few years (during former President Barack Obama\u2019s administration).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Looking to the future, 40% expect the federal government will act to help them with their top concern, 34% expect they will be hurt by federal actions, and 18% expect to see no impact. Interestingly, these results are similar to expectations four years ago under incoming President Trump \u2013 42% expected that the federal government would help their top concern and 33% said they would be hurt. The similarity in the top-line comparison, though, masks a sizable partisan swing. In 2017, 74% of Republicans expected that the new administration would help with their top concern while 61% of Democrats said they would be hurt. Today, 71% of Democrats expect federal actions will help their top concern and 60% of Republicans expect to be hurt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cPartisanship remains the driving factor in judging how Washington is doing. Biden continues to bank on large spending plans to try to chip away at that dynamic,\u201d said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The president\u2019s large spending plans remain broadly popular, including the Covid stimulus plan passed early in his term (62% support), his proposed infrastructure package (70%), and his proposal to expand access to health care, college, paid leave and other services (63%). The current results are nearly identical to prior polls taken this year. Support for the three plans ranges from 94% to 96% among Democrats, from 55% to 64% among independents, and from 31% to 42% among Republicans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Just over 4 in 10 (42%) Americans say these proposed plans should be passed as is, even if they do not get bipartisan support. This position is held by 71% of Democrats, but by only 35% of independents and 14% of Republicans. Another 27% of Americans say the plans should be significantly cut to get backing from both parties and 23% say they should not be passed at all even with bipartisan support. About 4 in 10 Republicans (39%) and 3 in 10 independents (31%) say the plans should not be passed at all. Just 2% of Democrats agree. These findings are very similar to the results for this question in Monmouth\u2019s June poll<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An attempt to start debate on a smaller bipartisan infrastructure bill failed a procedural vote in the Senate last week. The public is divided on whether the Republicans (26%), the Democrats (18%), or both parties equally (25%) are responsible for this failure. Another 30% are not sure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In terms of the overall impact of Biden\u2019s first six months in office, about 1 in 5 (21%) Americans say middle-class families have benefited from the president\u2019s policies a lot and another 41% say they have benefited a little, while 33% say the middle class have not benefited at all. The combined result for a lot and a little has increased from 51% in June to 62% now \u2013 as the number of people who say they do not know about the impact of Biden\u2019s policies on the middle class has declined (from 14% to 5%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The current results for this question are not much different than during most of Trump\u2019s term. Midway into the last presidency, 18% said Trump\u2019s policies benefited the middle class a lot, 37% a little, and 36% not at all (April 2019). Trump started out with much less favorable marks on this metric (11% a lot, 25% a little, and 53% not at all in December 2017), but he ended his term with somewhat more positive ratings (32% a lot, 33% a little, and 32% not at all in January 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Biden gets better marks for how much his policies have helped poor families \u2013 31% of the public says this group has benefited a lot, 35% a little, and 29% not at all.  These results are significantly better than for his predecessor. In April 2019, 14% said a lot, 26% said a little, and 51% said not at all about poor families benefiting from Trump\u2019s policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Turning to wealthy families, 22% say this group has benefited a lot, 30% a little, and 35% not at all from Biden\u2019s policies. Trump scored much better on helping the wealthy \u2013 58% said the rich benefited a lot, 22% a little, and 9% not at all from Trump\u2019s policies in 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhile Biden has not achieved stellar reviews for helping any one economic tier in the American public, his ratings are more evenly dispersed. There doesn\u2019t seem to be a sense he is favoring one group over another,\u201d said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Biden currently holds a job performance rating of 48% approve and 44% disapprove. This is similar to his 48%\u201343% rating in June and down from his 54%\u201341% rating in April. The president gets a positive rating from 93% of Democrats, 36% of independents, and 10% of Republicans. Prior approval levels for the incumbent registered 51% in March and 54% in January.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll also finds the public\u2019s job rating for Congress stands at 23% approve and 62% disapprove. Congressional approval had been hovering between 30% and 35% at the beginning of the year, but dropped to 21% in June. The current reading is in line with Monmouth polls through most of the Trump years, when approval ranged between 16% and 25% except for two 32% marks in the early months of the pandemic last year. The percentage of Americans who say the country is headed in the right direction (38%) versus the wrong track (56%) is similar to June\u2019s results (37% to 57%). The right track rating declined after hitting an eight-year high in April (46%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was conducted by telephone from July 21 to 26, 2021 with 804 adults in the United States.  The question results in this release have a margin of error of +\/- 3.5 percentage points. The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

QUESTIONS AND RESULTS     <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span>Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as president?<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021<\/td>		March
2021<\/td>		Jan.
2021<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>48%<\/strong><\/td>48%<\/td>54%<\/td>51%<\/td>54%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>44%<\/strong><\/td>43%<\/td>41%<\/td>42%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>5%<\/td>8%<\/td>16%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

2.<\/span>Do you approve or disapprove of the job the U.S. Congress is doing?<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021<\/td>		March
2021<\/td>		Jan.
2021<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>21%<\/td>35%<\/td>30%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>62%<\/strong><\/td>65%<\/td>56%<\/td>59%<\/td>51%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>15%<\/strong><\/td>15%<\/td>9%<\/td>11%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND: Continued<\/em><\/td>
Nov.
2020<\/td>		Early June
2020<\/td>
May
2020<\/td>
April
2020<\/td>
Feb.
2020<\/td>
Jan.
2020<\/td>
Dec.
2019<\/td>
Nov.
2019<\/td>
Sept.
2019<\/td>
Aug.
2019<\/td>
June
2019<\/td>
May
2019<\/td>
April
2019<\/td>
March
2019<\/td>
Jan.
2019<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>23%<\/td>22%<\/td>32%<\/td>32%<\/td>20%<\/td>24%<\/td>22%<\/td>23%<\/td>21%<\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>20%<\/td>24%<\/td>23%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>64%<\/td>69%<\/td>55%<\/td>55%<\/td>69%<\/td>62%<\/td>65%<\/td>64%<\/td>68%<\/td>71%<\/td>69%<\/td>71%<\/td>62%<\/td>68%<\/td>72%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>13%<\/td>9%<\/td>13%<\/td>13%<\/td>11%<\/td>14%<\/td>13%<\/td>13%<\/td>11%<\/td>13%<\/td>12%<\/td>9%<\/td>14%<\/td>9%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/td>(857)<\/em><\/td>(902)<\/em><\/td>(903)<\/em><\/td>(903)<\/em><\/td>(908)<\/em><\/td>(1,161)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(751)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND: Continued<\/em><\/td>Nov.
2018<\/td>		Aug.
2018<\/td>		June
2018<\/td>		April
2018<\/td>		March
2018<\/td>		Jan.
2018<\/td>		Dec.
2017<\/td>		Sept.
2017<\/td>		Aug.
2017<\/td>		July
2017<\/td>		May
2017<\/td>		March
2017<\/td>		Jan.
2017<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>23%<\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>17%<\/td>18%<\/td>21%<\/td>16%<\/td>17%<\/td>18%<\/td>19%<\/td>19%<\/td>25%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>63%<\/td>69%<\/td>67%<\/td>71%<\/td>72%<\/td>68%<\/td>65%<\/td>69%<\/td>69%<\/td>70%<\/td>68%<\/td>59%<\/td>66%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>14%<\/td>14%<\/td>14%<\/td>12%<\/td>11%<\/td>11%<\/td>19%<\/td>15%<\/td>13%<\/td>11%<\/td>13%<\/td>16%<\/td>11%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(1,009)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(1,002)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND: Continued<\/em><\/td>Sept.
2016*<\/td>		Aug.
2016*<\/td>		June
2016*<\/td>		March
2016<\/td>		Jan.
2016<\/td>		Dec.
2015<\/td>		Oct.
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2015<\/td>		Aug.
2015<\/td>		July
2015<\/td>		June
2015<\/td>		April
2015<\/td>		Jan.
2015<\/td>		Dec.
2014<\/td>		July
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>15%<\/td>14%<\/td>17%<\/td>22%<\/td>17%<\/td>16%<\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>18%<\/td>18%<\/td>19%<\/td>21%<\/td>18%<\/td>17%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>77%<\/td>78%<\/td>76%<\/td>68%<\/td>73%<\/td>73%<\/td>71%<\/td>71%<\/td>72%<\/td>69%<\/td>71%<\/td>67%<\/td>70%<\/td>73%<\/td>76%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) No opinion<\/td>8%<\/td>9%<\/td>7%<\/td>10%<\/td>10%<\/td>10%<\/td>12%<\/td>11%<\/td>11%<\/td>12%<\/td>10%<\/td>12%<\/td>11%<\/td>11%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(1,008)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,003)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,006)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,009)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,203)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,001)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,002)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,005)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,003)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,008)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

        * Registered voters<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

3.<\/span>Would you say things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they gotten off on the wrong track?<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021<\/td>		March
2021<\/td>		Jan.
2021<\/td><\/tr>
Right direction<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>37%<\/td>46%<\/td>34%<\/td>42%<\/td><\/tr>
Wrong track<\/td>56%<\/strong><\/td>57%<\/td>50%<\/td>61%<\/td>51%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>4%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND: Continued<\/em><\/td>Nov.
2020<\/td>		Early Sept.
2020<\/td>		Aug.
2020<\/td>		Late June
2020<\/td>		Early June
2020<\/td>		May
2020<\/td>		April
2020<\/td>		March
2020<\/td>		Feb.
2020<\/td>		Jan.
2020<\/td><\/tr>
Right direction<\/td>26%<\/td>27%<\/td>22%<\/td>18%<\/td>21%<\/td>33%<\/td>30%<\/td>39%<\/td>37%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Wrong track<\/td>68%<\/td>66%<\/td>72%<\/td>74%<\/td>74%<\/td>60%<\/td>61%<\/td>54%<\/td>57%<\/td>56%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(867)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(868)<\/em><\/td>(867)<\/em><\/td>(807)<\/em><\/td>(808)<\/em><\/td>(857)<\/em><\/td>(851)<\/em><\/td>(902)<\/em><\/td>(903)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND: Continued<\/em><\/td>Dec.
2019<\/td>		Nov.
2019<\/td>		Sept.
2019<\/td>		Aug.
2019<\/td>		June
2019<\/td>		May
2019<\/td>		April
2019<\/td>		March
2019<\/td>		Nov.
2018<\/td>		Aug.
2018<\/td>		June
2018<\/td>		April
2018<\/td>		March
2018<\/td>		Jan.
2018<\/td><\/tr>
Right direction<\/td>32%<\/td>30%<\/td>30%<\/td>28%<\/td>31%<\/td>29%<\/td>28%<\/td>29%<\/td>35%<\/td>35%<\/td>40%<\/td>33%<\/td>31%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Wrong track<\/td>56%<\/td>61%<\/td>61%<\/td>62%<\/td>62%<\/td>63%<\/td>62%<\/td>63%<\/td>55%<\/td>57%<\/td>53%<\/td>58%<\/td>61%<\/td>57%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>8%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>6%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(903)<\/em><\/td>(908)<\/em><\/td>(1,161)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(751)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND: Continued<\/em><\/td>Dec.
2017<\/td>		Aug.
2017<\/td>		May
2017<\/td>		March
2017<\/td>		Jan.
2017<\/td>		Aug.
2016*<\/td>		Oct.
2015<\/td>		July
2015<\/td>		June
2015<\/td>		April
2015<\/td>		Dec.
2014<\/td>		July
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Right direction<\/td>24%<\/td>32%<\/td>31%<\/td>35%<\/td>29%<\/td>30%<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>28%<\/td>23%<\/td>27%<\/td>23%<\/td>28%<\/td><\/tr>
Wrong track<\/td>66%<\/td>58%<\/td>61%<\/td>56%<\/td>65%<\/td>65%<\/td>66%<\/strong><\/td>63%<\/td>68%<\/td>66%<\/td>69%<\/td>63%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>7%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td>6%<\/strong><\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td>(805)<\/em><\/td>(1,002)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td>(1,001)<\/em><\/td>(1,002)<\/em><\/td>(1,005)<\/em><\/td>(1,008)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

        <\/em>* Registered voters<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span>Turning to issues closer to home, what is the biggest concern facing your family right now? [LIST WAS NOT READ<\/em>]<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND: <\/td>July<\/strong>
2021<\/strong><\/td>		Aug.
2020<\/td>		March
2020<\/td>		April
2019<\/td>		April
2018<\/td>		Jan.
2017<\/td>		Jan.
2015<\/td><\/tr>
Coronavirus\/COVID-19<\/td>17%<\/strong><\/td>39%<\/td>57%<\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Everyday bills, groceries, etc.<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>12%<\/td>12%<\/td>16%<\/td><\/tr>
The economy<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td>7%<\/td>5%<\/td>6%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Health care costs<\/td>7%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>19%<\/td>13%<\/td>25%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
Job security, unemployment<\/td>7%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/td>7%<\/td>7%<\/td>9%<\/td>14%<\/td>16%<\/td><\/tr>
Inflation<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Civil rights<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Climate change, environment<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>0%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Education policy<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Family illness, health<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
Housing, mortgage, rent<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
Quality of government<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>0%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Safety, crime<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Taxes<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>9%<\/td>7%<\/td>4%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
College tuition, school costs<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
Immigration<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>0%<\/td>0%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
Social Security, seniors<\/td>1%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Terrorism, national security<\/td>1%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
Guns, gun ownership<\/td>0%<\/strong><\/td>0%<\/td>0%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td>n\/a<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Retirement saving<\/td>0%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td>0%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
Other<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
Don\u2019t know\/No answer<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>8%<\/td>9%<\/td>16%<\/td>15%<\/td>10%<\/td>8%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(868)<\/em><\/td>(851)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(1,003)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Question 5 was asked only of <\/em>those who mentioned a concern in Q4: n=730<\/em>, <\/em>moe=+\/-3.6%<\/em>]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

5.<\/span>Thinking about this most important concern, have the actions of the federal government over the past six months helped, hurt, or had no real impact on this concern?<\/span><\/p>\n
TREND: <\/td>
July<\/strong>
2021<\/strong><\/td>
April
2019*<\/td>
April
2018*<\/td>
Jan.
2017**<\/td>
Jan.
2015**<\/td><\/tr>
Helped<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>14%<\/td>14%<\/td>27%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
Hurt<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>42%<\/td>39%<\/td>37%<\/td>47%<\/td><\/tr>
No real impact<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>42%<\/td>44%<\/td>34%<\/td>38%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(730)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(692)<\/em><\/td>(680)<\/em><\/td>(728)<\/em><\/td>(926)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

        ** 2017 and 2015 asked about \u201cthe past few years\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        * 2019 and 2018 asked about \u201cthe past year\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Question 6 was asked only of <\/em>those who mentioned a concern in Q4: n=730<\/em>, <\/em>moe=+\/-3.6%<\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6.<\/span>And do you think the actions of the federal government over the next few years will help, hurt, or have no real impact on this concern?<\/span><\/p>\n
TREND:<\/td>
July<\/strong>
2021<\/strong><\/td>
April
2019<\/td>
April
2018<\/td>
Jan.
2017<\/td><\/tr>
Help<\/td>40%<\/strong><\/td>29%<\/td>26%<\/td>42%<\/td><\/tr>
Hurt<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>32%<\/td>36%<\/td>33%<\/td><\/tr>
No real impact<\/td>18%<\/strong><\/td>26%<\/td>27%<\/td>21%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>13%<\/td>11%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(730)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(692)<\/em><\/td>(680)<\/em><\/td>(728)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

7.<\/span>How much have each of the following groups benefited from President Biden\u2019s policies so far. [READ ITEM<\/em>] <\/em>\u2013 Have they benefited a lot, a little, or not at all? [ITEMS WERE ROTATED<\/em>]<\/span><\/p>\n

Middle class families<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  COMPARISON:<\/td> <\/strong><\/td> <\/strong><\/td> <\/strong><\/td>Benefited under Trump<\/em><\/td>Benefited under Obama<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		 <\/strong><\/td> <\/strong><\/td>Jan.
2021<\/em><\/td>		April<\/em>
2019<\/em><\/td>		April
2018<\/em><\/td>		Dec.
2017<\/em><\/td>		 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>Jan.<\/em>
2017<\/em><\/td>		July<\/em>
2013<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
A lot<\/td>21%<\/strong><\/td>19%<\/td> <\/strong><\/td> <\/strong><\/td>32%<\/em><\/td>18%<\/em><\/td>14%<\/em><\/td>11%<\/em><\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>24%<\/em><\/td>12%<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
A little<\/td>41%<\/strong><\/td>32%<\/td> <\/strong><\/td> <\/strong><\/td>33%<\/em><\/td>37%<\/em><\/td>45%<\/em><\/td>25%<\/em><\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>41%<\/em><\/td>39%<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Not at all<\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/td> <\/strong><\/td> <\/strong><\/td>32%<\/em><\/td>36%<\/em><\/td>36%<\/em><\/td>53%<\/em><\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>33%<\/em><\/td>46%<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>14%<\/td> <\/strong><\/td> <\/strong><\/td>3%<\/em><\/td>9%<\/em><\/td>5%<\/em><\/td>11%<\/em><\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>2%<\/em><\/td>2%<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/strong><\/td> <\/em><\/strong><\/td>(809)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td>(806)<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Wealthy families<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  COMPARISON:<\/td> <\/strong><\/td> <\/em><\/td>Benefited under Trump<\/em><\/td>Benefited under Obama<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>April
2019<\/em><\/td>		April
2018<\/em><\/td>		 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>Jan.<\/em>
2017<\/em><\/td>		July<\/em>
2013<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
A lot<\/td>22%<\/strong><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>58%<\/em><\/td>57%<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>29%<\/em><\/td>35%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
A little<\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>22%<\/em><\/td>26%<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>43%<\/em><\/td>31%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Not at all<\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>9%<\/em><\/td>7%<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>17%<\/em><\/td>23%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>14%<\/strong><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>11%<\/em><\/td>10%<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>10%<\/em><\/td>10%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Poor families<\/p>\n\n\n\n
  COMPARISON:<\/td> <\/td> <\/em><\/td>Benefited under Trump<\/em><\/td>Benefited under Obama<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
          <\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		 <\/td> <\/td>April
2019<\/em><\/td>		April
2018<\/em><\/td>		 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>Jan.<\/em>
2017<\/em><\/td>		July<\/em>
2013<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
A lot<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td> <\/td> <\/td>14%<\/em><\/td>12%<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>39%<\/em><\/td>20%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
A little<\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td> <\/td> <\/td>26%<\/em><\/td>28%<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>36%<\/em><\/td>39%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Not at all<\/td>29%<\/strong><\/td> <\/td> <\/td>51%<\/em><\/td>53%<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>21%<\/em><\/td>37%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td> <\/td> <\/td>9%<\/em><\/td>7%<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>4%<\/em><\/td>4%<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(803)<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>(801)<\/em><\/td>(1,012)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

8.<\/span>Earlier this year, Congress passed a $1.9 trillion stimulus plan in response to the coronavirus pandemic. In general, do you support or oppose this plan? [Is that strongly or somewhat support\/oppose?]<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021<\/td>		March
2021*<\/td><\/tr>
Strongly support<\/td>40%<\/strong><\/td>39%<\/td>43%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat support<\/td>22%<\/strong><\/td>21%<\/td>20%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat oppose<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>11%<\/td>10%<\/td>11%<\/td><\/tr>
Strongly oppose<\/td>28%<\/strong><\/td>27%<\/td>24%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
 (n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td>(802)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

        * March 2021 poll asked about the plan before Congress passed it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[QUESTIONS 9 & 10 WERE ROTATED<\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

President Biden proposed other multi-trillion dollar spending plans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9.<\/span>[One is\/The other is] an infrastructure plan to be spent on roads, bridges and trains, internet access, power grid improvements, and clean energy projects. In general, do you support or oppose this plan? [Is that strongly or somewhat support\/oppose?]<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		 <\/strong><\/td>July<\/strong>
 2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021*<\/td><\/tr>
Strongly support<\/td>51%<\/strong><\/td>49%<\/td>Support<\/strong><\/td>70%<\/strong><\/td>68%<\/td>68%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat support<\/td>19%<\/strong><\/td>19%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat oppose<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>8%<\/td>Oppose<\/strong><\/td>29%<\/strong><\/td>29%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
Strongly oppose<\/td>21%<\/strong><\/td>21%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(n)<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

      * April 2021 wording was \u201cPresident Biden recently proposed a $2 trillion infrastructure plan\u2026\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

10.<\/span>[One is\/The other is] a plan to expand access to healthcare and childcare, and provide paid leave and college tuition support. In general, do you support or oppose this plan? [Is that strongly or somewhat support\/oppose?]<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		 <\/strong><\/td>July<\/strong>
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td>		April
2021*<\/td><\/tr>
Strongly support<\/td>47%<\/strong><\/td>41%<\/td>Support<\/strong><\/td>63%<\/strong><\/td>61%<\/td>64%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat support<\/td>16%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat oppose<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/td>Oppose<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td>34%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
Strongly oppose<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td>24%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>5%<\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>5%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(n)<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td>(800)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

      * April 2021 wording was \u201cBiden is also expected to propose a large spending plan \u2026\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

11.<\/span>What would you like to see happen with these spending plans \u2013 pass them as is even if they don\u2019t get bipartisan support, significantly cut them in order to get bipartisan support, or not pass them at all even if they have bipartisan support?<\/span><\/p>\n
  TREND:<\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td>		June
2021<\/td><\/tr>
Pass them as is<\/td>42%<\/strong><\/td>46%<\/td><\/tr>
Significantly cut them<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td>22%<\/td><\/tr>
Not pass them at all<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>24%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>(810)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

11A.<\/span>An attempt to start debate on a smaller bipartisan infrastructure bill failed in the Senate [this\/last] week. Who is more responsible for this failure \u2013 the Democrats, the Republicans, both equally, or aren\u2019t you sure? [CHOICES WERE ROTATED<\/em>]<\/span><\/p>\n
   <\/td>July
2021<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
The Democrats<\/td>18%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
The Republicans<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Both equally<\/td>25%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Not sure<\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
(n)<\/em><\/em><\/td>(804)<\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Q12-19 held for future release.<\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Q20-27 previously released.<\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

METHODOLOGY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from July 21 to 26, 2021 with a national random sample of 804 adults age 18 and older. This includes 276 contacted by a live interviewer on a landline telephone and 528 contacted by a live interviewer on a cell phone, in English. Telephone numbers were selected through a mix of random digit dialing and list-based sampling. Landline respondents were selected with a modified Troldahl-Carter youngest adult household screen. Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey design, data weighting and analysis. The full sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information (ACS 2018 one-year survey). Data collection support provided by Braun Research (field), Dynata (RDD sample), and Aristotle (list sample). For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points (unadjusted for sample design). Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below). In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Self-Reported<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
26% Republican<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
41% Independent<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
33% Democrat<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td><\/tr>
49% Male<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
51% Female<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td><\/tr>
29% 18-34<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
33% 35-54<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
38% 55+<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td><\/tr>
63% White<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
12% Black<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
16% Hispanic<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
  8% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td><\/tr>
69% No degree<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
31% 4 year degree<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and crosstabs by key demographic groups.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Spending plan support stays high; Covid declines as top family concern<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802249500,"template":"","geography":[18],"class_list":["post-40802249489","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-national"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802249489","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802249489\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802249578,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802249489\/revisions\/40802249578"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802249500"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802249489"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802249489"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}