{"id":40802207778,"date":"2015-08-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-12T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_081215\/"},"modified":"2019-05-14T13:05:06","modified_gmt":"2019-05-14T17:05:06","slug":"monmouthpoll_nj_081215","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_081215\/","title":{"rendered":"Public Supports Investigation of Clinton Emails"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

West Long Branch, NJ<\/em> \u2013 A majority of American voters are not particularly suspicious of Hillary Clinton\u2019s use of a personal email account when she was Secretary of State.  Still, most support a criminal investigation of those emails for the potential release of classified material.  The Monmouth University Poll<\/em><\/strong> also measured voter opinion of several presidential candidates before last week\u2019s GOP debate, finding Clinton and Donald Trump with the highest negative ratings among independent voters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just over half (51%) of registered voters feel that Hillary Clinton\u2019s use of a personal email account during her time as Secretary of State was mainly a matter of convenience compared to 38% who say this behavior suggests she has something to hide.  Most Democrats (80%) say it was a matter of convenience, while most Republicans (68%) say she has something to hide.  Independents are split \u2013 48% say it was out of convenience and 41% say it suggests she may be hiding something.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even though most voters feel Clinton\u2019s intentions may have been acceptable, a majority (52%) say that her emails should be subject to a criminal investigation for the potential release of classified material.  Another 41% say the emails should not be subject to this type of investigation.  Most Republicans (82%) and a majority of independents (54%) support an investigation, while two-thirds (66%) of Democrats are opposed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll also found that Republicans are paying the most attention to this story.  Overall, 61% of all voters have heard a lot about the former Secretary of State\u2019s use of private emails and another 24% have heard a little.  Republicans (78%) are more likely than Democrats (56%) or independents (56%) to have heard a lot about this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cInitial media reports of a criminal probe proved to be inaccurate, but most voters feel that the potential release of classified information merits investigation,\u201d said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute based in West Long Branch, NJ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> also found that Hillary Clinton has high negative ratings among independent voters, currently standing at 27% favorable to 52% unfavorable.  These results are similar to the 26% favorable to 55% unfavorable rating she held among independents in June.  Her overall voter rating is 38% favorable to 48% unfavorable, which is slightly worse than the overall 41% to 44% rating she received two months ago.  This drop was driven mostly by a decline in favorability among Democratic voters from 83% in June to 76% in the current poll.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOpinion among Clinton\u2019s fellow Democrats has declined but remains high.  They will still vote for her in November 2016 if she is the nominee.  Unless those numbers come down substantially in the next few months, the independent voter group is the one to watch,\u201d said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Voter opinion has improved for Bernie Sanders, Clinton\u2019s chief rival for the Democratic nomination, but he remains largely unknown.  His overall rating now stands at 24% favorable to 26% unfavorable, compared with 15% to 24% two months ago.  Among independents he earns a split 24% favorable to 23% unfavorable rating, which is up from 15% to 26% in June.  Still, about half of all voters regardless of party affiliation have no opinion of Sanders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the Republican side, Donald Trump\u2019s negative ratings among independent voters are comparable to Clinton\u2019s numbers.  It is important to keep in mind that the poll was conducted before last week\u2019s GOP debate and, thus, opinion could have shifted significantly since then.  These results provide a picture of where the Republican field stood going into that first debate and as a benchmark for later poll readings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s overall rating last week stood at 31% favorable and 54% unfavorable, compared with 18% unfavorable and 57% favorable right before he announced his candidacy in mid-June.  Independent voter opinion of Trump in the current poll measured at 30% favorable to 54% unfavorable.  Though negative, this result is an improvement over his 20% to 56% independent rating in June.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Other Republican candidates included in the poll did not see much change in their ratings among independent voters.  Jeb Bush\u2019s rating of 33% favorable to 43% unfavorable was better than his June rating of 26% to 46% mainly due to improving Republican voter opinion.  His 29% favorable to 45% unfavorable rating among independents is basically unchanged from the 25% to 44% rating he received two months ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Voters rendered split decisions on Rand Paul \u2013 31% favorable to 31% unfavorable overall and 33% to 27% among independents \u2013 and Scott Walker \u2013 26% to 26% overall and 26% to 25% among independents.  Voters are slightly more positive toward Marco Rubio \u2013 30% to 26% overall and 31% to 24% among independents \u2013 and more negative toward Ted Cruz \u2013 27% to 33% overall and 25% to 35% among independents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was conducted by telephone from July 30 to August 2, 2015 with 1,203 adults in the United States.  This release is based on a sample of 1,033 registered voters and has a margin of error of \u00b1 3.1 percent.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

*  Methodological note:  The partisan breakdown for candidate ratings in this polling release differs slightly from the Monmouth University nomination contest polls released last week.  This is due to the fact that the prior releases counted independent voters who lean toward a party as partisans.  This release groups those \u201cleaners\u201d as independents.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

DATA TABLES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The questions referred to in this release are as follows:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span> Please tell me if your general impression of each of the following is favorable or unfavorable, or if you don\u2019t really have an opinion. [NAMES WERE ROTATED]<\/span><\/p>\n

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>13%<\/td>27%<\/td>76%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>48%<\/strong><\/td>81%<\/td>52%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>14%<\/strong><\/td>6%<\/td>21%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>8%<\/td>24%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>45%<\/td>23%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>50%<\/strong><\/td>47%<\/td>54%<\/td>47%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>57%<\/td>29%<\/td>21%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>43%<\/strong><\/td>27%<\/td>45%<\/td>55%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>16%<\/td>26%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Texas Senator Ted Cruz<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td>51%<\/td>25%<\/td>11%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>13%<\/td>35%<\/td>52%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>40%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/td>41%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>48%<\/td>33%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>21%<\/td>27%<\/td>45%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>30%<\/td>40%<\/td>40%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Florida Senator Marco Rubio<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td>54%<\/td>31%<\/td>11%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>11%<\/td>24%<\/td>41%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>44%<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/td>45%<\/td>47%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Businessman Donald Trump<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>49%<\/td>30%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>54%<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/td>54%<\/td>72%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>14%<\/strong><\/td>15%<\/td>16%<\/td>12%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>50%<\/td>26%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>25%<\/td>45%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>48%<\/strong><\/td>41%<\/td>49%<\/td>49%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/td>\n

Favorable<\/p>\n<\/td>

Unfavorable<\/td>\n

No opinion<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton<\/td>\n

38%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

48%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

14%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

–June 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

41<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

44<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

14<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders<\/td>\n

24%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

26%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

50%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

–June 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

15<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

24<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

61<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush<\/td>\n

 33%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 43%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 24%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

–June 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

26<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

46<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

28<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Texas Senator Ted Cruz<\/td>\n

 27%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 33%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 40%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

–June 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

25<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

34<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

41<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul<\/td>\n

 31%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 31%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 38%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

–June 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

26<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

34<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

41<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Florida Senator Marco Rubio<\/td>\n

 30%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 26%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 44%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

–June 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

31<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

27<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

42<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Businessman Donald Trump<\/td>\n

 31%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 54%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 14%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

–June 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

18<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

57<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

25<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker<\/td>\n

 26%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 26%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

 48%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

–June 2015<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

23<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

25<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

52<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

2.<\/span> How much have you seen or heard about Hillary Clinton using a personal email account during her time as Secretary of State?<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

A lot<\/td>61%<\/strong><\/td>78%<\/td>56%<\/td>56%<\/td><\/tr>
A little<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>15%<\/td>24%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
Nothing at all<\/td>15%<\/strong><\/td>7%<\/td>20%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

3.<\/span> Do you think Hillary Clinton using a personal email account for official business suggests she has something to hide or was more a matter of convenience?<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Has something to hide<\/td>38%<\/strong><\/td>68%<\/td>41%<\/td>8%<\/td><\/tr>
A matter of convenience<\/td>51%<\/strong><\/td>23%<\/td>48%<\/td>80%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>12%<\/td>12%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span> Do you think Hillary Clinton\u2019s emails should be subject to a criminal investigation for potential release of classified material, or not?<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>

PARTY ID<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>

Rep<\/p><\/td>

Ind<\/td>

Dem<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Should be<\/td>52%<\/strong><\/td>82%<\/td>54%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
Should not be<\/td>41%<\/strong><\/td>16%<\/td>38%<\/td>66%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>7%<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/td>8%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from July 30 to August 2, 2015 with a national random sample of 1,203 adults age 18 and older.  This includes 842 contacted by a live interviewer on a landline telephone and 361 contacted by a live interviewer on a cell phone, in English.  Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey design, data weighting and analysis. Final sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information.  Data collection support provided by Braun Research (field) and SSI (RDD sample).  The results in this poll release are based on a subsample of 1,003 registered voters.  For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points (unadjusted for sample design).  Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below).  In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)FULL SAMPLE – ALL ADULTS<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

25% Rep<\/em><\/td>49% Male<\/em><\/td>32% 18-34<\/em><\/td>

66% White<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

45% Ind<\/em><\/td>51% Female<\/em><\/td>36% 35-54<\/em><\/td>

12% Black<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

31% Dem<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>32% 55+<\/em><\/td>

15% Hispanic<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a07% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)REGISTERED VOTERS ONLY<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

27% Rep<\/em><\/td>48% Male<\/em><\/td>24% 18-34<\/em><\/td>

71% White<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

42% Ind<\/em><\/td>52% Female<\/em><\/td>39% 35-54<\/em><\/td>

12% Black<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

30% Dem<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>37% 55+<\/em><\/td>

11% Hispanic<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 6% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and results by key demographic groups.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pre-debate ratings: Clinton, Trump most negative among independents<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802251239,"template":"","geography":[18],"class_list":["post-40802207778","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-national"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207778\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802239983,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207778\/revisions\/40802239983"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802251239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802207778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802207778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}