{"id":40802207629,"date":"2009-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-10T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_021009\/"},"modified":"2019-07-22T11:21:01","modified_gmt":"2019-07-22T15:21:01","slug":"monmouthpoll_nj_021009","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_021009\/","title":{"rendered":"New Jersey Wants Stimulus and Cost Cutting"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

New Jerseyans are confident in President Obama\u2019s ability to deal with the current financial crisis and most back his stimulus proposal, although they are uncertain of its impact.  The latest Monmouth University\/Gannett New Jersey Poll<\/em><\/strong> finds a different story at the state level, though.  Garden State residents express less confidence in their governor than their president, few say the state is doing enough to control costs, and many prefer laying off state workers to deferring current pension obligations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The vast majority (78%) of New Jerseyans feel their state government is not doing enough to control costs during the current economic downturn.  Only 13% say Trenton is keeping costs under control.  Local governments and school districts fare better by comparison.  About 4-in-10 state residents (40%) say their local municipal government is doing enough to control costs (50% say it is not), and a similar number say the same about their local school district (39% is doing enough to 42% is not).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Governor Jon Corzine has proposed allowing local governments to defer some of their pension obligations to make up for reductions in state aid.  The governor has also said that layoffs may be necessary if the state employee unions do not accept a wage freeze.  Critics have already called for state worker layoffs in order to avoid creating more debt.  When asked to choose between these options, slightly more New Jersey residents prefer laying off state government workers in order to cut costs (44%) than putting off current pension payments and increasing future state debt in order to maintain the current level of government services (34%).  Another 15% reject this tradeoff and 8% have no opinion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Only Republicans are clearly in favor of layoffs \u2013 52% support this option versus 32% who would defer pension payments to maintain services.  Independents tend to prefer the layoffs (42%) to pension deferrals (29%), although 21% reject this as a necessary tradeoff.  The governor\u2019s fellow Democrats are divided \u2013 39% favor layoffs to 43% who prefer pension deferrals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cJon Corzine is in a thorny situation.  Ideally, these decisions would be based purely on the merits, but it\u2019s hard to ignore the political ramifications in an election year.  The governor can\u2019t upset his base, but he must also build his standing among independents,\u201d said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The governor laid out some specific plans to deal with the crisis in a speech to the legislature in October and again in his State of the State address last month.  Just 32% of New Jerseyans say they have heard about the governor\u2019s plan to help New Jersey deal with the financial crisis.  Among those who are aware of his ideas, only 32% say the proposals will make things better for New Jersey families.  Another 41% say the governor\u2019s proposals will make no difference and 21% say his plan will make things worse for New Jersey families.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overall, confidence in the state government\u2019s ability to deal with the financial crisis is lukewarm.  Just under half of New Jersey residents are either very (9%) or somewhat (39%) confident in Governor Corzine\u2019s ability to handle the current situation.  A similar number are generally confident \u2013 5% very and 42% somewhat \u2013 in the state legislature.  Confidence in the governor on this issue has slipped by about 6 points since October 2008, while the legislature\u2019s rating is unchanged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By comparison, fully 3-in-4 New Jerseyans say they are either very (40%) or somewhat (34%) confident in President Barack Obama\u2019s ability to handle the current financial crisis.  This represents a slight increase in the confidence that was expressed in the then-candidate in an October 2008 poll.  Currently, 54% of Republicans and 65% of independents join 94% of Democrats in expressing at least some confidence in the new president\u2019s ability to handle the situation.  The poll also found that 55% of Garden State residents are generally confident in Congress\u2019 ability to deal with the economy, although only 1-in-10 (10%) say they are very <\/em>confident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cPresident Obama\u2019s leadership on the crisis is generating confidence, even though New Jerseyans are uncertain whether his stimulus package will really put the economy back on track,\u201d said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nearly two-thirds (64%) of the New Jersey public agree that some sort of economic stimulus package is necessary to improve the current state of the economy.  A somewhat smaller majority (55%) approve of the president\u2019s $800+ billion stimulus proposal that includes tax cuts, aid to states, and spending on several infrastructure projects.  Only 24% disapprove of the plan and another 21% say they do not know enough about it to form an opinion.  Predictably, a large number of Democrats (73%) approve of the proposal.  Nearly half (49%) of independents also approve, while Republicans are divided \u2013 37% approve to 43% disapprove.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overall, about 1-in-3 (31%) New Jerseyans feel that the current stimulus bill will have a major impact on improving the economy if enacted and another 45% say that any impact will be minor.  Only 15% say that the plan will have no impact at all and 9% have no opinion.  Expectations are mixed even among those who support the president\u2019s proposal \u2013 46% of those who approve of the plan say the economic impact will be major, while a similar 47% say it will probably be minor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll also found that Garden State residents continue to be more somewhat optimistic about their own personal finances than they are about the nation\u2019s.  Specifically, 51% feel optimistic about their family\u2019s financial situation over the next 12 months, while 44% are pessimistic.  By comparison, fewer New Jerseyans \u2013 37% \u2013 feel optimistic about the state of the national economy in the coming year, whereas 61% are pessimistic.  These results are basically unchanged from the October 2008 poll.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University\/Gannett New Jersey Poll<\/em> was conducted by telephone with 803 New Jersey adults February 2-8, 2009.  This sample has a margin of error of<\/p>\n\n\n\n

+ 3.5 percent.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute and originally published by the Gannett New Jersey newspaper group (Asbury Park Press, Courier-Post, Courier News, Daily Journal, Daily Record, and Home News Tribune).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DATA TABLES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The questions referred to in this release are as follows:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[QUESTIONS 1 AND 2 WERE ROTATED<\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span> Thinking about the next 12 months, would you say you feel optimistic or pessimistic about your own family\u2019s financial situation?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Optimistic<\/td>51%<\/strong><\/td>50%<\/em><\/td>55%<\/td>48%<\/td>48%<\/td>54%<\/td>49%<\/td>51%<\/td><\/tr>
Pessimistic<\/td>44%<\/strong><\/td>45%<\/em><\/td>42%<\/td>45%<\/td>46%<\/td>42%<\/td>45%<\/td>46%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/em><\/td>3%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td>6%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

2.<\/span> Thinking about the next 12 months, would you say you feel optimistic or pessimistic about the state of the national economy?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Optimistic<\/td>37%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/em><\/td>46%<\/td>27%<\/td>32%<\/td>43%<\/td>33%<\/td>33%<\/td><\/tr>
Pessimistic<\/td>61%<\/strong><\/td>62%<\/em><\/td>51%<\/td>70%<\/td>66%<\/td>55%<\/td>61%<\/td>67%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/em><\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>6%<\/td>0%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TRENDS:
Registered voters only<\/em><\/strong><\/td>		\n

Family\u2019s financial situation<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

State of national economy<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

Feb.
2009<\/p>\n<\/td>

Oct.
2008<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		\n

Oct.
2008<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Optimistic<\/td>50%<\/td>49%<\/td>36%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
Pessimistic<\/td>45%<\/td>42%<\/td>62%<\/td>59%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>4%<\/td>9%<\/td>2%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

721<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

900<\/em><\/td>721<\/em><\/td>\n

900<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

3.<\/span> How confident are you in the ability of each of the following to handle the current financial crisis: very confident, somewhat confident, not very confident, or not confident at all? \u00a0\u00a0[ITEMS WERE ROTATED]<\/span><\/p>\n

Barack Obama<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Very confident<\/td>40%<\/strong><\/td>39%<\/em><\/td>63%<\/td>27%<\/td>20%<\/td>51%<\/td>41%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat confident<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/em><\/td>31%<\/td>38%<\/td>34%<\/td>30%<\/td>35%<\/td>43%<\/td><\/tr>
Not very confident<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/em><\/td>2%<\/td>13%<\/td>17%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>12%<\/td><\/tr>
Not at all confident<\/td>12%<\/strong><\/td>12%<\/em><\/td>3%<\/td>15%<\/td>23%<\/td>10%<\/td>11%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/em><\/td>2%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Congress<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Very confident<\/td>10%<\/strong><\/td>11%<\/em><\/td>17%<\/td>4%<\/td>9%<\/td>14%<\/td>8%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat confident<\/td>45%<\/strong><\/td>42%<\/em><\/td>60%<\/td>37%<\/td>34%<\/td>48%<\/td>49%<\/td>40%<\/td><\/tr>
Not very confident<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>26%<\/em><\/td>15%<\/td>27%<\/td>32%<\/td>22%<\/td>23%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
Not at all confident<\/td>19%<\/strong><\/td>19%<\/em><\/td>8%<\/td>27%<\/td>24%<\/td>16%<\/td>17%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/em><\/td>0%<\/td>4%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Jon Corzine<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Very confident<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/em><\/td>14%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>14%<\/td>7%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat confident<\/td>39%<\/strong><\/td>37%<\/em><\/td>50%<\/td>36%<\/td>27%<\/td>37%<\/td>45%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
Not very confident<\/td>25%<\/strong><\/td>26%<\/em><\/td>20%<\/td>29%<\/td>32%<\/td>23%<\/td>23%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
Not at all confident<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>24%<\/em><\/td>14%<\/td>27%<\/td>32%<\/td>23%<\/td>23%<\/td>26%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/em><\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

The New Jersey state legislature<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Very confident<\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>5%<\/em><\/td>5%<\/td>1%<\/td>5%<\/td>9%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat confident<\/td>42%<\/strong><\/td>41%<\/em><\/td>55%<\/td>36%<\/td>31%<\/td>40%<\/td>44%<\/td>40%<\/td><\/tr>
Not very confident<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>27%<\/em><\/td>24%<\/td>27%<\/td>31%<\/td>28%<\/td>23%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
Not at all confident<\/td>21%<\/strong><\/td>22%<\/em><\/td>9%<\/td>31%<\/td>27%<\/td>18%<\/td>20%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>6%<\/strong><\/td>5%<\/em><\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>9%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/strong><\/td>721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>225<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TRENDS:
Registered voters only<\/em><\/strong><\/td>		\n

Barack Obama<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

U.S. Congress<\/strong><\/td>Jon Corzine<\/strong>td>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

NJ state legislature<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

Feb.
2009<\/p>\n<\/td>

Oct.
2008<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		Oct.
2008<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		Oct.
2008<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		\n

Oct.
2008<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Very confident<\/td>39%<\/td>35%<\/td>11%<\/td>7%<\/td>10%<\/td>14%<\/td>5%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat confident<\/td>35%<\/td>33%<\/td>42%<\/td>44%<\/td>37%<\/td>39%<\/td>41%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
Not very confident<\/td>10%<\/td>12%<\/td>26%<\/td>24%<\/td>26%<\/td>17%<\/td>27%<\/td>20%<\/td><\/tr>
Not at all confident<\/td>12%<\/td>15%<\/td>19%<\/td>19%<\/td>24%<\/td>24%<\/td>22%<\/td>21%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>2%<\/td>6%<\/td>2%<\/td>7%<\/td>5%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

721<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

900<\/em><\/td>721<\/em><\/td>900<\/em><\/td>721<\/em><\/td>900<\/em><\/td>721<\/em><\/td>\n

900<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span> Do you think that an economic stimulus package is necessary to improve the current state of the economy, or not?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Is necessary<\/td>64%<\/strong><\/td>64%<\/em><\/td>80%<\/td>55%<\/td>54%<\/td>62%<\/td>66%<\/td>66%<\/td><\/tr>
Is NOT  necessary<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td>28%<\/em><\/td>13%<\/td>37%<\/td>36%<\/td>28%<\/td>25%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>8%<\/em><\/td>7%<\/td>8%<\/td>10%<\/td>10%<\/td>9%<\/td>5%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

5.<\/span> President Obama has proposed a more than 800 billion dollar plan that would include tax cuts, aid to states, and spending on several infrastructure projects. Do you approve or disapprove of this plan? If you do not know enough about this to have an opinion, please just say so.<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Approve<\/td>55%<\/strong><\/td>55%<\/em><\/td>73%<\/td>49%<\/td>37%<\/td>60%<\/td>57%<\/td>53%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>24%<\/em><\/td>4%<\/td>33%<\/td>43%<\/td>18%<\/td>22%<\/td>32%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Depends<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/em><\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion\/don\u2019t know<\/td>18%<\/strong><\/td>17%<\/em><\/td>20%<\/td>14%<\/td>16%<\/td>19%<\/td>18%<\/td>12%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

6.<\/span> Do you think this plan will have a major impact, minor impact, or no impact in improving the economy?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Major impact<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>30%<\/em><\/td>50%<\/td>20%<\/td>18%<\/td>35%<\/td>30%<\/td>26%<\/td><\/tr>
Minor impact<\/td>45%<\/strong><\/td>45%<\/em><\/td>40%<\/td>49%<\/td>49%<\/td>43%<\/td>51%<\/td>47%<\/td><\/tr>
No impact<\/td>15%<\/strong><\/td>16%<\/em><\/td>3%<\/td>23%<\/td>22%<\/td>13%<\/td>13%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/em><\/td>7%<\/td>8%<\/td>10%<\/td>9%<\/td>6%<\/td>9%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

7.<\/span> Have you read or heard anything about Governor Corzine\u2019s plan to help New Jersey deal with the financial crisis?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Yes<\/td>32%<\/strong><\/td>34%<\/em><\/td>29%<\/td>37%<\/td>30%<\/td>26%<\/td>31%<\/td>41%<\/td><\/tr>
No<\/td>67%<\/strong><\/td>65%<\/em><\/td>70%<\/td>63%<\/td>70%<\/td>74%<\/td>68%<\/td>58%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>1%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/em><\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

 [The following question was asked only of those who said \u201cYes\u201d to Q7,<\/em> moe= \u00b1<\/em> 5.8%<\/em>]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

8.<\/span> Do you think his plan will make things better or worse for New Jersey families, or will it make no difference?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Better<\/td>32%<\/strong><\/td>30%<\/em><\/td>53%<\/td>22%<\/td>16%<\/td>37%<\/td>34%<\/td>28%<\/td><\/tr>
Worse<\/td>21%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/em><\/td>9%<\/td>25%<\/td>36%<\/td>30%<\/td>18%<\/td>21%<\/td><\/tr>
No difference<\/td>41%<\/strong><\/td>44%<\/em><\/td>28%<\/td>48%<\/td>47%<\/td>30%<\/td>42%<\/td>47%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>6%<\/strong><\/td>6%<\/em><\/td>9%<\/td>5%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

288<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

271<\/em><\/td>86<\/em><\/td>119<\/em><\/td>62<\/em><\/td>52<\/em><\/td>94<\/em><\/td>\n

103<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

9.<\/span> Which of the following would you favor more: laying off state government workers in order to cut costs – OR- putting off current pension payments and increasing future state debt in order to maintain the current level of government services? [RESPONSE OPTIONS WERE ROTATED]<\/em> <\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Laying off state workers<\/td>44%<\/strong><\/td>45%<\/em><\/td>39%<\/td>42%<\/td>52%<\/td>34%<\/td>44%<\/td>56%<\/td><\/tr>
Putting off pension payments<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>32%<\/em><\/td>43%<\/td>29%<\/td>32%<\/td>41%<\/td>32%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Neither<\/td>15%<\/strong><\/td>15%<\/em><\/td>13%<\/td>21%<\/td>6%<\/td>18%<\/td>13%<\/td>12%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>8%<\/em><\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>9%<\/td>8%<\/td>11%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/td>309<\/td>178<\/td>199<\/td>260<\/td>225<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

10.<\/span> Do you think the state government in Trenton IS or IS NOT doing enough to control costs during this time?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

IS doing enough<\/td>13%<\/strong><\/td>12%<\/em><\/td>17%<\/td>11%<\/td>9%<\/td>18%<\/td>10%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
IS NOT doing enough<\/td>78%<\/strong><\/td>79%<\/em><\/td>75%<\/td>79%<\/td>86%<\/td>73%<\/td>80%<\/td>81%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/em><\/td>9%<\/td>10%<\/td>6%<\/td>9%<\/td>11%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

721<\/em><\/td>261<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>178<\/em><\/td>199<\/em><\/td>260<\/em><\/td>\n

225<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Question 11 was asked of a random half-sample: moe= \u00b1<\/em><\/strong> 4.9%<\/em>]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

11.<\/span> Do you think your local municipal government IS or IS NOT doing enough to control costs during this time?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

IS doing enough<\/td>40%<\/strong><\/td>39%<\/em><\/td>47%<\/td>38%<\/td>34%<\/td>35%<\/td>45%<\/td>38%<\/td><\/tr>
IS NOT doing enough<\/td>50%<\/strong><\/td>51%<\/em><\/td>45%<\/td>53%<\/td>61%<\/td>52%<\/td>47%<\/td>58%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/em><\/td>8%<\/td>9%<\/td>5%<\/td>13%<\/td>8%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

401<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

363<\/em><\/td>131<\/em><\/td>157<\/em><\/td>87<\/em><\/td>101<\/em><\/td>121<\/em><\/td>\n

124<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Question 12 was asked of a random half-sample: moe= \u00b1<\/em><\/strong> 4.9%<\/em>]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

12.<\/span> Do you think your local school district IS or IS NOT doing enough to control costs during this time?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

Registered
<\/em>Voters<\/em><\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

INCOME<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Dem<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><$50K<\/td>$50-100K<\/td>\n

>$100K<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

IS doing enough<\/td>39%<\/strong><\/td>38%<\/em><\/td>46%<\/td>38%<\/td>29%<\/td>38%<\/td>33%<\/td>48%<\/td><\/tr>
IS NOT doing enough<\/td>42%<\/strong><\/td>42%<\/em><\/td>39%<\/td>45%<\/td>43%<\/td>43%<\/td>44%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>20%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/em><\/td>15%<\/td>18%<\/td>28%<\/td>19%<\/td>22%<\/td>12%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

402<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

358<\/em><\/td>130<\/td>152<\/td>91<\/td>98<\/td>139<\/td>\n

101<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University\/Gannett New Jersey Poll<\/em> was conducted and analyzed by the Monmouth University Polling Institute research staff.  The telephone interviews were collected by Braun Research on February 2-8, 2009 with a statewide random sample of 803 New Jersey adults. For results based on this voter sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.  Sampling error increases as the sample size decreases, so statements based on various population subgroups, such as separate figures reported by gender or party identification, are subject to more error than are statements based on the total sample.  In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is the Monmouth University Polling Institute\u2019s policy to conduct surveys of all adult New Jersey residents, including voters and non-voters, on issues which affect the state.  Specific voter surveys are conducted when appropriate during election cycles.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and results by key demographic groups.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Residents more confident in Obama than Corzine<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802251239,"template":"","geography":[30],"class_list":["post-40802207629","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-new-jersey"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207629\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802242850,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207629\/revisions\/40802242850"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802251239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802207629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802207629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}