{"id":40802207522,"date":"2015-05-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-05-04T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_050415\/"},"modified":"2019-05-17T16:14:55","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T20:14:55","slug":"monmouthpoll_nj_050415","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_050415\/","title":{"rendered":"Public Reacts to Bridgegate Charges"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

West Long Branch, N.J. \u2013<\/em> Gov. Chris Christie\u2019s ratings have taken a significant hit in the Monmouth University Poll<\/em><\/strong>, with most New Jerseyans inclined to believe that he was actually involved in the decision to close toll lanes on the George Washington Bridge in 2013 or at least that he knew about it at the time.  The first poll taken since the U.S. Attorney announced charges in the Bridgegate case also found that just 1-in-10 Garden State residents believe that the three individuals indicted in the scheme were the only ones involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gov. Christie\u2019s overall job rating currently stands at 35% approve to 54% disapprove among New Jersey residents and 35% approve to 56% disapprove among the state\u2019s registered voters.  This marks a significant drop from just a few months ago and is an all-time low in Christie\u2019s net job rating.  In February, his job rating stood at 48% approve to 44% disapprove among all residents and 47% approve to 46% disapprove among voters.  The governor\u2019s job approval rating in the Monmouth University Poll<\/em> once stood as high as 70% \u2013 that was in February 2013 following Superstorm Sandy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New Jersey Republicans continue to support their governor, giving him a 65% approve to 32% disapprove job rating, down only slightly from the 70% to 24% rating he received three months ago.  He has lost significantly more ground among independents \u2013 34% approve to 51% disapprove in the current poll compared to 47% to 43% in February, as well as Democrats \u2013 now 19% approve to 69% disapprove compared to 39% to 55% in February.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cChristie\u2019s overwhelmingly positive ratings in the aftermath of Sandy have now been sliced in half,\u201d said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.  \u201cChristie\u2019s ratings had stabilized after the initial Bridgegate revelations early last year.  They started to erode again last fall, but these post-indictment numbers mark a significant acceleration in that decline.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Attorney\u2019s office unsealed indictments against three former Christie associates in the Bridgegate scheme on Friday, including a guilty plea entered by David Wildstein.  Only 1-in-10 New Jerseyans (9%) believe the three people charged were the only individuals responsible for the decision to close the lanes.  Another 3-in-4 feel others were involved, including 33% who say the conspiracy was limited to just a few others, 22% who feel that involvement in Bridgegate was fairly widespread throughout the Christie administration, and 22% who are not sure how many other people may have been involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll also found that more than 2-in-3 New Jerseyans (69%) feel Gov. Christie has not been completely honest about what he knew.  Just 23% say he has come clean.  Nearly 4-in-5 Democrats (79%) and 2-in-3 independents (68%) believe Christie is not telling the truth, which is not much different than the findings in a September 2014 Monmouth poll.  However, a majority of Garden State Republicans (52%) now say that Christie has not been completely honest and just 39% believe he has.  This is a marked reversal from last fall when most Republicans (52%) said Christie had told the truth and only 36% said he had not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While Republicans now feel that Christie hasn\u2019t come clean, most still accept his assertion that he was not involved in the lane closure decision and that he did not know about it at the time.  This puts GOP partisans at odds with Democrats and independents.  Specifically, 56% of all New Jerseyans think that Christie knew about the lane closures as they were happening in September 2013 and just 33% say he learned about them sometime later.  Majorities of state Democrats (71%) and independents (55%) say Christie was aware, but only 35% of Republicans agree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Half of state residents (50%) also feel that the governor was personally involved in the decision to close the toll lanes, while just 34% say he was not involved.  This marks a change from June 2014 when state opinion was more divided, with 46% saying Christie was involved and 42% saying he wasn\u2019t.  This shift in opinion has come mostly from independents \u2013 52% now believe Christie was involved compared to 43% who felt that way last year.  About 6-in-10 (59%) Democrats say he was involved which is similar to the 56% who felt that way last year, while just 29% of Republicans feel he was involved which is similar to the 32% who said the same last June.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe governor has maintained that he was not involved in the lane closures nor did he know about them as they were happening.  Most New Jerseyans don\u2019t buy it,\u201d said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

David Wildstein\u2019s attorney alleged \u201cevidence exists\u201d that Christie knew about the lane closures at the time.  Just over 4-in-10 (42%) say this makes them more likely to believe Christie knew, 6% say it makes them less likely, and 50% say this information does not change their opinion.  [It should be noted that those who say the attorney\u2019s allegation makes them more likely to believe Christie had knowledge of the closures tend to be people who already feel that way.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll found nearly half (49%) of New Jerseyans believe that the alleged reason for the lane closures \u2013 retaliation against a local official who would not support the governor \u2013 was \u201cpolitics as usual\u201d in the Christie administration.  Another 41% feel this behavior was unusual.  Democrats (53%) and independents (54%) are more likely than Republicans (34%) to feel this behavior was politics as usual.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The indictment also claims that employees of the administration\u2019s intergovernmental affairs unit actively sought campaign endorsements for the governor\u2019s re-election bid.  Only 9% of New Jerseyans think it is acceptable for non-political staff to engage in this type of political activity, while 53% say it is not acceptable.  Another 39% are not sure how they feel about this.  There are few significant partisan differences in this opinion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> also found that only 30% of New Jerseyans now have a favorable opinion of Chris Christie as a person and 47% hold an unfavorable view.  Another 23% have no opinion.  State opinion was more evenly divided just three months ago at 38% favorable and 40% unfavorable.  A majority of Republicans (55%) hold a positive view of Christie as a person, but just 29% of independents and 16% of Democrats feel the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhen you are running for President, your home state record is often less important than what kind of person voters think you are.  These numbers are not encouraging for someone with aspirations to the White House,\u201d added Murray.  Note:  Monmouth will be releasing a New Jersey poll regarding Chris Christie\u2019s presidential potential on Wednesday.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was conducted by telephone with 500 New Jersey adults, including 441 registered voters, from May 1 to 3, 2015.  The total sample has a margin of error of \u00b1 4.4 percent and the registered voter sample has a margin of error of \u00b1 4.7 percent.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DATA TABLES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The questions referred to in this release are as follows:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span> Do you approve or disapprove of the job Chris Christie is doing as governor?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Approve<\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/td>34%<\/td>19%<\/td>34%<\/td>65%<\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>54%<\/strong><\/td>56%<\/td>43%<\/td>69%<\/td>51%<\/td>32%<\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>23%<\/td>12%<\/td>14%<\/td>3%<\/td> <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
All adults <\/em>Second term<\/em><\/td>		May
2015<\/td>		Feb.
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2014<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td>		Dec.
2013<\/td>		Sept.
2013<\/td>		April
2013<\/td>		Feb.
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>35%<\/td>48%<\/td>46%<\/td>50%<\/td>51%<\/td>50%<\/td>59%<\/td>65%<\/td>61%<\/td>63%<\/td>70%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>54%<\/td>44%<\/td>39%<\/td>42%<\/td>41%<\/td>44%<\/td>32%<\/td>25%<\/td>24%<\/td>26%<\/td>17%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>11%<\/td>8%<\/td>15%<\/td>9%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>10%<\/td>15%<\/td>11%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

500<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

805<\/em><\/td>802<\/em><\/td>800<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>541<\/em><\/td>802<\/em><\/td>783<\/em><\/td>806<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
All adults <\/em>First term<\/em><\/td>		Dec.
2012<\/td>		Sept.
2012<\/td>		July
2012<\/td>		April
2012<\/td>		Feb.
2012<\/td>		Oct.
2011<\/td>		Aug.
2011<\/td>		May
2011<\/td>		Feb.
2011<\/td>		Sept.
2010<\/span><\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>67%<\/td>53%<\/td>52%<\/td>51%<\/td>52%<\/td>54%<\/td>48%<\/td>47%<\/td>47%<\/td>45%<\/td>44%<\/td>41%<\/td>33%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>21%<\/td>35%<\/td>36%<\/td>35%<\/td>38%<\/td>38%<\/td>42%<\/td>49%<\/td>40%<\/td>38%<\/td>44%<\/td>44%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>12%<\/td>11%<\/td>12%<\/td>14%<\/td>10%<\/td>9%<\/td>9%<\/td>5%<\/td>12%<\/td>17%<\/td>12%<\/td>15%<\/td>52%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

816<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

805<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>804<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>817<\/em><\/td>802<\/em><\/td>807<\/em><\/td>801<\/em><\/td>801<\/em><\/td>801<\/em><\/td>804<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered voters <\/em>Second term<\/em><\/td>		May.
2015<\/td>		Feb.
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2014<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td>		Dec.
2013<\/td>		Sept.
2013<\/td>		April
2013<\/td>		Feb.
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>35%<\/td>47%<\/td>46%<\/td>49%<\/td>51%<\/td>49%<\/td>58%<\/td>65%<\/td>63%<\/td>65%<\/td>70%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>56%<\/td>46%<\/td>42%<\/td>43%<\/td>43%<\/td>46%<\/td>35%<\/td>27%<\/td>24%<\/td>26%<\/td>16%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/td>6%<\/td>12%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td>7%<\/td>8%<\/td>13%<\/td>10%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

441<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

712<\/em><\/td>680<\/em><\/td>717<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>470<\/em><\/td>698<\/em><\/td>674<\/em><\/td>694<\/em><\/td>\n

697<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered voters First term<\/em><\/td>		Dec.
2012<\/td>		Sept.
2012<\/td>		July
2012<\/td>		April
2012<\/td>		Feb.
2012<\/td>		Oct.
2011<\/td>		Aug.
2011<\/td>		May
2011<\/td>		Feb.
2011<\/td>		Sept.
2010<\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>69%<\/td>55%<\/td>53%<\/td>50%<\/td>55%<\/td>55%<\/td>50%<\/td>46%<\/td>49%<\/td>44%<\/td>45%<\/td>42%<\/td>31%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>22%<\/td>36%<\/td>35%<\/td>38%<\/td>37%<\/td>37%<\/td>41%<\/td>49%<\/td>41%<\/td>40%<\/td>43%<\/td>44%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/td>10%<\/td>12%<\/td>12%<\/td>9%<\/td>8%<\/td>8%<\/td>5%<\/td>9%<\/td>16%<\/td>12%<\/td>13%<\/td>53%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

726<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

715<\/em><\/td>678<\/em><\/td>692<\/em><\/td>709<\/em><\/td>693<\/em><\/td>730<\/em><\/td>725<\/em><\/td>718<\/em><\/td>726<\/em><\/td>747<\/em><\/td>719<\/em><\/td>\n

716<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

2.<\/span> Is your general impression of Chris Christie favorable or unfavorable, or do you have no opinion of him?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td>31%<\/td>24%<\/td>16%<\/td>29%<\/td>55%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>47%<\/strong><\/td>49%<\/td>36%<\/td>63%<\/td>44%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/td>39%<\/td>22%<\/td>27%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
All adults<\/em><\/td>		May
2015<\/td>		Feb.
2015<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2013<\/td>		Sept.
2012<\/td><\/tr>
Favorable<\/td>30%<\/td>38%<\/td>45%<\/td>40%<\/td>42%<\/td>44%<\/td>70%<\/td>52%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>47%<\/td>40%<\/td>38%<\/td>35%<\/td>37%<\/td>28%<\/td>19%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>23%<\/td>23%<\/td>17%<\/td>25%<\/td>21%<\/td>28%<\/td>11%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

500<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

805<\/em><\/td>800<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>541<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>\n

805<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered voters only<\/em><\/td>		May
2015<\/td>		Feb.
2015<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2013<\/td>		Sept.
2012<\/td><\/tr>
Favorable<\/td>31%<\/td>39%<\/td>46%<\/td>41%<\/td>43%<\/td>46%<\/td>71%<\/td>54%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>49%<\/td>42%<\/td>39%<\/td>37%<\/td>39%<\/td>31%<\/td>18%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>20%<\/td>19%<\/td>15%<\/td>22%<\/td>18%<\/td>23%<\/td>10%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

441<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

712<\/em><\/td>717<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>470<\/em><\/td>697<\/em><\/td>\n

715<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Turning to the closure of the George Washington Bridge toll lanes in Fort Lee in 2013.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3.<\/span> Do you think the governor himself was or was not personally involved in the decision to close the toll lanes?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Was involved<\/td>50%<\/strong><\/td>52%<\/td>36%<\/td>59%<\/td>52%<\/td>29%<\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
Was not involved<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>34%<\/td>34%<\/td>25%<\/td>31%<\/td>58%<\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>16%<\/strong><\/td>13%<\/td>29%<\/td>16%<\/td>17%<\/td>13%<\/td> <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
  TREND:<\/td>May
2015<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td><\/tr>
Was involved<\/td>50%<\/td>46%<\/td>47%<\/td>50%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
Was not involved<\/td>34%<\/td>42%<\/td>38%<\/td>40%<\/td>52%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>16%<\/td>12%<\/td>15%<\/td>10%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

500<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

800<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>751<\/em><\/td>\n

474<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span> Do you believe Chris Christie has been completely honest about what he knows about the incident, or not?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Been completely honest<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>24%<\/td>21%<\/td>13%<\/td>24%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
Not been completely honest<\/td>69%<\/strong><\/td>69%<\/td>67%<\/td>79%<\/td>68%<\/td>52%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>7%<\/td>12%<\/td>7%<\/td>8%<\/td>9%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>  TREND:<\/td>May
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td><\/tr>
Been completely honest<\/td>23%<\/td>29%<\/td>32%<\/td>33%<\/td>40%<\/td><\/tr>
Not been completely honest<\/td>69%<\/td>60%<\/td>61%<\/td>61%<\/td>51%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>8%<\/td>11%<\/td>7%<\/td>5%<\/td>9%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

500<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

802<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>751<\/em><\/td>\n

474<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

5.<\/span> Do you think Christie knew about the lane closures at the time they were happening in September 2013, or did he not learn about them until sometime later?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Knew at time they were happening<\/td>56%<\/strong><\/td>56%<\/td>59%<\/td>71%<\/td>55%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
Did not learn until sometime later<\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/td>23%<\/td>21%<\/td>32%<\/td>59%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>10%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>18%<\/td>8%<\/td>13%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

6.<\/span> Have you heard that one former Christie appointee pled guilty to crimes related to the lane closures and two others were indicted, or haven\u2019t you heard that?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Yes, heard<\/td>70%<\/strong><\/td>75%<\/td>48%<\/td>68%<\/td>72%<\/td>70%<\/td><\/tr>
No, haven\u2019t heard<\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td>25%<\/td>52%<\/td>32%<\/td>28%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

7.<\/span> Do you think that these three people were the only ones involved in the conspiracy to close the toll lanes or were others involved? [IF OTHERS WERE INVOLVED:\u00a0 Do you think it was just a few others or was the involvement fairly widespread in the Christie administration?]<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>Yes<\/td>No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><\/tr>
Only these three involved<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>13%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr>
Others involved \u2013 just a few<\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>37%<\/td>16%<\/td>34%<\/td>31%<\/td>38%<\/td><\/tr>
Others involved \u2013 widespread<\/td>22%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/td>32%<\/td>19%<\/td>27%<\/td>14%<\/td><\/tr>
Others involved \u2013 not sure how many<\/td>22%<\/strong><\/td>21%<\/td>28%<\/td>28%<\/td>21%<\/td>16%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Disagree with indictments \u2013
there was no conspiracy<\/td>		1%<\/strong><\/td>0%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>0%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>12%<\/strong><\/td>13%<\/td>8%<\/td>13%<\/td>12%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

8.<\/span> It has been reported that the lane closure was retaliation because the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee would not endorse Christie for re-election. Do you think taking retribution against political enemies was politics as usual in the Christie administration or do you think that this behavior was unusual?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Politics as usual<\/td>49%<\/strong><\/td>49%<\/td>50%<\/td>53%<\/td>54%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
Unusual<\/td>41%<\/strong><\/td>41%<\/td>46%<\/td>39%<\/td>37%<\/td>57%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/td>5%<\/td>9%<\/td>9%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

        Note: The following question was asked previously regarding the closing of the toll lanes; \u201cDo you think this kind of action is politics as usual in the Christie administration or do you think that this was unusual?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/td>Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td><\/tr>
Politics as usual<\/td>49%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
Unusual<\/td>46%<\/td>55%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>5%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

751<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

474<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

9.<\/span> The lawyer for David Wildstein, the person who pled guilty, says there is evidence that Christie knew about the lane closures when they were happening. Does this make you more likely or less likely to believe that Christie knew about the incident at the time, or does this not affect your opinion?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

More likely<\/td>42%<\/strong><\/td>44%<\/td>32%<\/td>59%<\/td>41%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr>
Less likely<\/td>6%<\/strong><\/td>5%<\/td>9%<\/td>3%<\/td>6%<\/td>11%<\/td><\/tr>
Does not affect opinion<\/td>50%<\/strong><\/td>49%<\/td>57%<\/td>37%<\/td>51%<\/td>68%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

10.<\/span> There are also reports that non-political staff members in the governor\u2019s office actively sought endorsements on behalf of Christie\u2019s re-election campaign. Do you think this type of political activity by people in the governor\u2019s office is acceptable or not acceptable, or do you have no opinion about it?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Acceptable<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/td>3%<\/td>7%<\/td>9%<\/td>11%<\/td><\/tr>
Not acceptable<\/td>53%<\/strong><\/td>53%<\/td>48%<\/td>55%<\/td>54%<\/td>45%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>39%<\/strong><\/td>37%<\/td>49%<\/td>37%<\/td>38%<\/td>44%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from May 1 to 3, 2015 with a statewide random sample of 500 adult residents, including 375 contacted via live interview on a landline telephone and 125 via live interview on a cell phone, in English.  Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey questionnaire design, data weighting and analysis.  Final sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information.  Data collection support provided by Braun Research (field) and SSI (RDD sample).  For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points (unadjusted for sample design).  Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below).  In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

34% Dem<\/em><\/td>50% Male<\/em><\/td>28% 18-34<\/em><\/td>\n

63% White<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

46% Ind<\/em><\/td>50% Female<\/em><\/td>39% 35-54<\/em><\/td>\n

13% Black<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

20% Rep<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>33% 55+<\/em><\/td>\n

15% Hispanic<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

      9% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

Registered Voter Sample (weighted)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

36% Dem<\/em><\/td>45% Male<\/em><\/td>21% 18-34<\/em><\/td>\n

67% White<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

42% Ind<\/em><\/td>55% Female<\/em><\/td>41% 35-54<\/em><\/td>\n

13% Black<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

22% Rep<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>38% 55+<\/em><\/td>\n

14% Hispanic<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

      6% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

It is the Monmouth University Polling Institute\u2019s policy to conduct surveys of all adult residents, including voters and non-voters, on issues that affect them.  Specific voter surveys are conducted when appropriate during election cycles.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and results by key demographic groups.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Most say Christie was aware of lane closures<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802251239,"template":"","geography":[30],"class_list":["post-40802207522","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-new-jersey"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207522\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802240138,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207522\/revisions\/40802240138"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802251239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802207522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802207522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}