{"id":40802207512,"date":"2015-06-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-06-17T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_us_061715\/"},"modified":"2019-05-17T15:19:35","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T19:19:35","slug":"monmouthpoll_us_061715","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_us_061715\/","title":{"rendered":"Voters Optimistic for 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

West Long Branch, NJ<\/em>  – American voters are looking forward to electing a new president in 2016, according to the Monmouth University Poll<\/em><\/strong> .  However, they differ on which candidates vying for the White House are held in the highest esteem.  The only contender who arouses solid bi-partisan opinion is the latest entrant to the field, Donald Trump.  Unfortunately for him, that opinion is largely negative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More than 2-in-3 (69%) American voters say they feel optimistic about the 2016 election and just 25% are pessimistic.  Fully, 81% of Republicans, 70% of Democrats, and 60% of independents feel optimistic about electing a new president.  Most voters (57%) say they feel about the same amount of enthusiasm for the upcoming race as they did in past elections.  The remainder are split between feeling either more enthusiastic (21%) or less enthusiastic (22%).  Republicans are slightly more (27%) rather than less (15%) enthusiastic, while Democrats are slightly less (27%) rather than more (17%) enthusiastic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll also asked voters their opinion of eight presidential contenders – six Republicans and two Democrats.  Of this group, only Florida Senator Marco Rubio earns a net positive rating.  Donald Trump, who threw his hat into the ring yesterday, has the highest negatives.  Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush does slightly better than former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton among independent voters, but Clinton is better positioned than Bush in the presidential swing states – the ten states where the margin of victory in the 2012 election was less than seven percentage points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Donald Trump earns an 18% favorable and 57% unfavorable rating among American voters.  He is the only candidate in the field where there is little partisan* difference in these ratings – 65% of Democrats, 56% of independents, and 50% of Republicans all have an unfavorable opinion of Trump.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Donald Trump takes pride in doing things big.  Well, that certainly describes the negative ratings he gets from voters,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute based in West Long Branch, NJ.  Murray added, “While the Republican field has no clear front-runner, Marco Rubio seems to be in the best position right now to use the electability argument to his advantage.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marco Rubio gets a narrow net positive rating of 31% favorable and 27% unfavorable from American voters.  Of the eight candidates tested in the poll, Rubio performs the best with independent voters – garnering a 33% favorable and 22% unfavorable rating.  He is also competitive in the so-called swing states, earning a 29% favorable to 28% unfavorable rating from voters in those crucial states.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jeb Bush, who announced his candidacy on Monday, earns a net negative rating of 26% favorable and 46% unfavorable among American voters, including a 25% favorable and 44% unfavorable rating among independents.  He also does the worst of any candidate tested in the poll – other than Trump – with swing state voters at 25% favorable and 49% unfavorable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Democratic front runner Hillary Clinton earns a 41% favorable and 44% unfavorable rating among American voters.  She does worse than Bush among independent voters nationwide – 26% favorable and 55% unfavorable.  However, she does comparatively better in the swing states at 38% favorable and 47% unfavorable.  Clinton is the only candidate among the eight tested whose ratings show a sizable gender gap.  Women voters give her a narrow positive rating of 45% favorable and 40% unfavorable, while men give her a decidedly negative rating of 36% favorable and 49% unfavorable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among other candidates vying for the presidency, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker performs relatively evenly with a 23% favorable to 25% unfavorable rating, although most voters still have no opinion of him.  Walker gets a 24% favorable and 20% unfavorable rating among independents and a 24% favorable and 24% unfavorable rating among swing state voters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul earns a 26% favorable to 34% unfavorable rating and Texas Senator Ted Cruz gets a similar 25% favorable and 34% unfavorable rating.  However, Paul does better among independents – 31% favorable and 27% unfavorable – than Cruz does – 24% favorable and 31% unfavorable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders earns a 15% favorable and 24% unfavorable rating overall, with 6-in-10 American voters having no opinion of the liberal stalwart.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em>  was conducted by telephone from June 11 to 14, 2015 with 1,002 adults in the United States.   This release is based on a sample of 829 registered voters.  This voter sample has a margin of error of \u00b1 3.4 percent.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

*  Methodological note:  The partisan breakdown for candidate ratings in this polling release differs slightly from the Monmouth University nomination contest polls released earlier in the week.  This is due to the fact that the prior releases counted independent voters who lean toward a party as partisans.  This release groups those “leaners” as independents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The questions referred to in this release are as follows:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span> Please tell me if your general impression of each of the following is favorable or unfavorable, or if you don\u2019t really have an opinion. [NAMES WERE ROTATED]<\/span><\/p>\n

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>41%<\/strong><\/td>12%<\/td>26%<\/td>83%<\/td>36%<\/td>45%<\/td>39%<\/td>42%<\/td>42%<\/td>38%<\/td>39%<\/td>36%<\/td>48%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>44%<\/strong><\/td>73%<\/td>55%<\/td>8%<\/td>49%<\/td>40%<\/td>40%<\/td>44%<\/td>47%<\/td>47%<\/td>46%<\/td>49%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>14%<\/strong><\/td>14%<\/td>19%<\/td>9%<\/td>14%<\/td>15%<\/td>21%<\/td>14%<\/td>11%<\/td>15%<\/td>16%<\/td>15%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>15%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>15%<\/td>26%<\/td>17%<\/td>14%<\/td>15%<\/td>14%<\/td>16%<\/td>16%<\/td>14%<\/td>15%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>27%<\/td>26%<\/td>18%<\/td>30%<\/td>18%<\/td>21%<\/td>22%<\/td>27%<\/td>20%<\/td>26%<\/td>24%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>61%<\/strong><\/td>70%<\/td>59%<\/td>55%<\/td>53%<\/td>68%<\/td>64%<\/td>63%<\/td>57%<\/td>64%<\/td>60%<\/td>61%<\/td>60%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

2.<\/span> Please tell me if your general impression of each of the following is favorable or unfavorable, or if you don\u2019t really have an opinion. [NAMES WERE ROTATED]<\/span><\/p>\n

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>43%<\/td>25%<\/td>16%<\/td>28%<\/td>25%<\/td>19%<\/td>24%<\/td>34%<\/td>25%<\/td>24%<\/td>30%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>46%<\/strong><\/td>30%<\/td>44%<\/td>60%<\/td>49%<\/td>43%<\/td>51%<\/td>48%<\/td>41%<\/td>49%<\/td>43%<\/td>43%<\/td>47%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>28%<\/strong><\/td>27%<\/td>31%<\/td>24%<\/td>23%<\/td>32%<\/td>30%<\/td>28%<\/td>25%<\/td>26%<\/td>33%<\/td>27%<\/td>26%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Texas Senator Ted Cruz<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>25%<\/strong><\/td>48%<\/td>24%<\/td>8%<\/td>30%<\/td>22%<\/td>23%<\/td>24%<\/td>28%<\/td>29%<\/td>23%<\/td>31%<\/td>20%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>16%<\/td>31%<\/td>53%<\/td>39%<\/td>30%<\/td>36%<\/td>32%<\/td>36%<\/td>31%<\/td>32%<\/td>34%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>41%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/td>45%<\/td>39%<\/td>31%<\/td>49%<\/td>42%<\/td>44%<\/td>37%<\/td>41%<\/td>45%<\/td>34%<\/td>41%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/td>31%<\/td>11%<\/td>32%<\/td>21%<\/td>30%<\/td>25%<\/td>23%<\/td>24%<\/td>34%<\/td>29%<\/td>20%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>27%<\/td>27%<\/td>48%<\/td>35%<\/td>32%<\/td>26%<\/td>32%<\/td>40%<\/td>31%<\/td>28%<\/td>30%<\/td>40%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>41%<\/strong><\/td>37%<\/td>42%<\/td>41%<\/td>34%<\/td>47%<\/td>43%<\/td>43%<\/td>37%<\/td>44%<\/td>38%<\/td>41%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Florida Senator Marco Rubio<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>49%<\/td>33%<\/td>14%<\/td>36%<\/td>26%<\/td>25%<\/td>28%<\/td>36%<\/td>29%<\/td>29%<\/td>41%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td>14%<\/td>22%<\/td>42%<\/td>31%<\/td>23%<\/td>27%<\/td>26%<\/td>28%<\/td>28%<\/td>29%<\/td>19%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>42%<\/strong><\/td>37%<\/td>45%<\/td>44%<\/td>32%<\/td>52%<\/td>48%<\/td>46%<\/td>36%<\/td>44%<\/td>42%<\/td>40%<\/td>44%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Businessman Donald Trump<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>18%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/td>20%<\/td>12%<\/td>17%<\/td>18%<\/td>20%<\/td>18%<\/td>16%<\/td>13%<\/td>19%<\/td>15%<\/td>22%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>57%<\/strong><\/td>50%<\/td>56%<\/td>65%<\/td>58%<\/td>57%<\/td>56%<\/td>55%<\/td>60%<\/td>55%<\/td>52%<\/td>61%<\/td>60%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>25%<\/strong><\/td>30%<\/td>24%<\/td>22%<\/td>24%<\/td>25%<\/td>24%<\/td>27%<\/td>24%<\/td>32%<\/td>29%<\/td>23%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker<\/p>\n\n\n\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favorable<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>39%<\/td>24%<\/td>7%<\/td>27%<\/td>19%<\/td>14%<\/td>21%<\/td>29%<\/td>24%<\/td>22%<\/td>23%<\/td>22%<\/td><\/tr>
Unfavorable<\/td>25%<\/strong><\/td>12%<\/td>20%<\/td>43%<\/td>30%<\/td>21%<\/td>20%<\/td>25%<\/td>29%<\/td>24%<\/td>27%<\/td>19%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>52%<\/strong><\/td>49%<\/td>56%<\/td>50%<\/td>43%<\/td>60%<\/td>65%<\/td>53%<\/td>43%<\/td>53%<\/td>51%<\/td>58%<\/td>49%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

3.<\/span> Thinking about the 2016 election, do you feel optimistic or pessimistic about electing a new president?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

PARTY ID<\/td>GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Optimistic<\/td>69%<\/strong><\/td>81%<\/td>60%<\/td>70%<\/td>66%<\/td>71%<\/td>69%<\/td>70%<\/td>67%<\/td>69%<\/td>61%<\/td>72%<\/td>71%<\/td><\/tr>
Pessimistic<\/td>25%<\/strong><\/td>17%<\/td>31%<\/td>22%<\/td>25%<\/td>24%<\/td>24%<\/td>24%<\/td>26%<\/td>24%<\/td>29%<\/td>25%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Neither<\/td>4%<\/strong><\/td>0%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>7%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span> Compared to past elections, are you more enthusiastic than usual, less enthusiastic, or about the same as past elections?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td>

GENDER<\/td>AGE<\/td>\n

2012 SWING STATE<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td>

Ind<\/td>Dem<\/td>Male<\/td>Female<\/td>18-34<\/td>35-54<\/td>55+<\/td>Swing, <7%<\/td>Lean, 7-12%<\/td>Red, >12%<\/td>\n

Blue, >12%<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

More enthusiastic<\/td>21%<\/strong><\/td>27%<\/td>20%<\/td>17%<\/td>20%<\/td>21%<\/td>23%<\/td>19%<\/td>20%<\/td>16%<\/td>22%<\/td>29%<\/td>19%<\/td><\/tr>
Less enthusiastic<\/td>22%<\/strong><\/td>15%<\/td>19%<\/td>27%<\/td>18%<\/td>25%<\/td>22%<\/td>16%<\/td>26%<\/td>22%<\/td>22%<\/td>18%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
About the same<\/td>57%<\/strong><\/td>57%<\/td>58%<\/td>56%<\/td>60%<\/td>54%<\/td>53%<\/td>64%<\/td>52%<\/td>61%<\/td>54%<\/td>53%<\/td>57%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>1%<\/strong><\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>0%<\/td>2%<\/td>0%<\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from June 11 to 14, 2015 with a national random sample of 1,002 adults age 18 and older.  This includes 700 contacted by a live interviewer on a landline telephone and 302 contacted by a live interviewer on a cell phone, in English.  Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey design, data weighting and analysis. Final sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information.  Data collection support provided by Braun Research (field) and SSI (RDD sample).  The results in this poll release are based on a subsample of 829 registered voters.  For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points (unadjusted for sample design).  Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below).  In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)\u00a0 FULL SAMPLE – ALL ADULTS<\/em><\/p> <\/td><\/tr>

24% Rep<\/em><\/td>49% Male<\/em><\/td>31% 18-34<\/em><\/td>\n

67% White<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

44% Ind<\/em><\/td>51% Female<\/em><\/td>37% 35-54<\/em><\/td>\n

12% Black<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

32% Dem<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>32% 55+<\/em><\/td>\n

15% Hispanic<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

      7% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
\n

POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)  <\/em><\/p>\n

REGISTERED VOTERS ONLY<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

26% Rep<\/em><\/td>46% Male<\/em><\/td>23% 18-34<\/em><\/td>\n

70% White<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

42% Ind<\/em><\/td>54% Female<\/em><\/td>39% 35-54<\/em><\/td>\n

12% Black<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

32% Dem<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>38% 55+<\/em><\/td>\n

12% Hispanic<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

      6% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and results by key demographic groups.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Candidate ratings: Rubio well-positioned, huge negatives for Trump<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802251239,"template":"","geography":[18],"class_list":["post-40802207512","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-national"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207512\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802240108,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207512\/revisions\/40802240108"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802251239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802207512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802207512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}