{"id":40802207509,"date":"2015-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-07-07T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_070715\/"},"modified":"2019-05-17T14:39:50","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T18:39:50","slug":"monmouthpoll_nj_070715","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_070715\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama Ratings Up, Senators Down"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

West Long Branch, N.J. –<\/em>  After taking a slight dip in May, Pres. Obama’s job rating stands above 50% in New Jersey, while the state’s two U.S. Senators’ ratings have dipped.  The Monmouth University Poll<\/em><\/strong>  also found increased support for Obamacare and gay marriage after recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings.  On the state level, few say that Gov. Christie can claim pension reform as a major accomplishment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sen. Bob Menendez garners a 37% approve to 36% disapprove rating among all New Jersey residents and a 38% approve to 38% disapprove rating among registered voters.  This marks a slight decline from his May voter rating of 42% approve to 38% disapprove.  This is the first time Menendez does not have a net positive rating among Garden State voters.  The senator’s ratings have been dropping since he was indicted on federal corruption charges this spring.  In a February poll taken before the indictment was unsealed, Menendez held a solid 49% approve to 27% disapprove rating among New Jersey voters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The corruption indictment appears to be taking a toll on the senator’s popularity,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, N.J.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sen. Cory Booker earns a 44% approve to 22% disapprove rating among all Garden State residents and a 45% approve to 24% disapprove rating among registered voters.  This is down from the 51% to 21% voter rating he held earlier this year, but still marks a largely net positive rating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A majority (51%) of New Jersey adults approve of the job Barack Obama is doing and 45% disapprove.  Among registered voters, 52% approve and 46% disapprove.  This is a slight uptick from May, when Garden State voter opinion of the president stood at 48% approve to 46% disapprove, but the current results are slightly lower than February when Obama’s rating was 54% to 42%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The past couple of weeks have been good for the president, and that is reflected both in his job approval rating and an uptick in support for his signature healthcare policy,” said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Currently, 49% of New Jerseyans have a favorable opinion of the Affordable Care Act and 43% hold an unfavorable view.  This comes after the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to the law.  It also marks the highest positive rating for Obamacare in Monmouth’s New Jersey polling going back to 2013.  One year ago, Garden State opinion stood at a net negative 42% favorable and 52% unfavorable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another U.S. Supreme Court ruling declared same sex marriage to be legal throughout the country.  New Jersey’s courts made this determination nearly two years ago.  Today, fully 7-in-10 (70%) New Jersey residents favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally, including nearly half who strongly favor same sex marriage.  Just 21% are opposed.  Support has grown since the federal and state court decisions.  In April 2013, 59% of New Jerseyans favored same sex marriage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another court decision with significant implications is the recent New Jersey Supreme Court ruling that struck down the payment schedule in the 2011 pension reform law.  Just 12% of state residents approve of Gov. Christie’s decision to forego the full pension payment this year, while 42% disapprove and 46% have no opinion.  Just 11% of New Jerseyans say that Christie can claim major accomplishments in fixing the state’s pension system, 31% say he has had only minor accomplishments, and nearly half – 47% – say he has no real pension accomplishments to crow about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The governor can’t expect the public to see pension reform as one of his major accomplishments after he asked the court to overturn a key provision in his own law,” said Murray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the pension costs balloon, most New Jerseyans feel the state is obligated to pay those benefits for current workers.  Specifically, 31% say that state workers deserve the pension benefits they have earned no matter the cost and 46% say state worker pension benefits may be too high but we should give them what they were promised.  Only 19% say that pension benefits for current workers are way too high and should be cut.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll also asked about the job the state legislature is doing.  Currently, 32% of New Jersey voters approve and 51% disapprove.  This is down from the 33% approve to 48% disapprove rating the legislature received in May.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em>  was conducted by telephone with 503 New Jersey adults, including 453 registered voters, from June 30 to July 1, 2015.  The total sample has a margin of error of \u00b1  4.4 percent and the registered voter sample has a margin of error of \u00b1  4.6 percent.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DATA TABLES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The questions referred to in this release are as follows:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span> Do you approve or disapprove of the job the state legislature is doing?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Approve<\/td>32%<\/strong><\/td>32%<\/td>34%<\/td>28%<\/td>33%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>48%<\/strong><\/td>51%<\/td>31%<\/td>51%<\/td>46%<\/td>48%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>20%<\/strong><\/td>17%<\/td>35%<\/td>20%<\/td>21%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered Voters<\/em><\/td>		July
2015<\/td>		May
2015<\/td>		Feb.
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2014<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td>		Dec.
2013<\/td>		Sept.
2013<\/td>		April
2013<\/td>		Feb.
2013<\/td>		Dec.
2012<\/td>		Sept.
2012<\/td>		July
2012<\/td>		April
2012<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>32%<\/td>33%<\/td>37%<\/td>35%<\/td>36%<\/td>38%<\/td>38%<\/td>47%<\/td>44%<\/td>38%<\/td>41%<\/td>40%<\/td>43%<\/td>32%<\/td>34%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>51%<\/td>48%<\/td>46%<\/td>46%<\/td>48%<\/td>46%<\/td>47%<\/td>35%<\/td>38%<\/td>36%<\/td>42%<\/td>35%<\/td>34%<\/td>43%<\/td>45%<\/td>41%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>17%<\/td>15%<\/td>14%<\/td>18%<\/td>19%<\/td>27%<\/td>17%<\/td>25%<\/td>22%<\/td>25%<\/td>21%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

453<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

441<\/em><\/td>712<\/em><\/td>680<\/em><\/td>717<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>470<\/em><\/td>698<\/em><\/td>674<\/em><\/td>694<\/em><\/td>697<\/em><\/td>726<\/em><\/td>715<\/em><\/td>678<\/em><\/td>\n

692<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered Voters Continued<\/em><\/td>		Feb.
2012<\/td>		Oct.
2011<\/td>		Aug.
2011<\/td>		May
2011<\/td>		Feb.
2011<\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td>		July
2009<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		Sept.
2008<\/td>		July
2008<\/td>		April
2008<\/td>		March
2008<\/td>		Oct.
2007<\/td>		Feb.
2007<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>34%<\/td>33%<\/td>35%<\/td>32%<\/td>29%<\/td>25%<\/td>19%<\/td>24%<\/td>31%<\/td>23%<\/td>29%<\/td>27%<\/td>28%<\/td>25%<\/td>32%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>42%<\/td>45%<\/td>48%<\/td>48%<\/td>45%<\/td>49%<\/td>57%<\/td>49%<\/td>48%<\/td>55%<\/td>50%<\/td>47%<\/td>55%<\/td>53%<\/td>43%<\/td>42%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>24%<\/td>22%<\/td>17%<\/td>20%<\/td>26%<\/td>26%<\/td>24%<\/td>27%<\/td>22%<\/td>22%<\/td>21%<\/td>26%<\/td>17%<\/td>22%<\/td>25%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

709<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

693<\/em><\/td>730<\/em><\/td>725<\/em><\/td>718<\/em><\/td>747<\/em><\/td>719<\/em><\/td>716<\/em><\/td>792<\/em><\/td>721<\/em><\/td>709<\/em><\/td>889<\/em><\/td>720<\/em><\/td>719<\/em><\/td>688<\/em><\/td>\n

681<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

2.<\/span> Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Approve<\/td>51%<\/strong><\/td>52%<\/td>50%<\/td>80%<\/td>43%<\/td>20%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>45%<\/strong><\/td>46%<\/td>43%<\/td>17%<\/td>53%<\/td>78%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>7%<\/td>2%<\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered <\/em>Voters – Second Term<\/em><\/td>		July
2015<\/td>		May
2015<\/td>		Feb.
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2014<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Jan.
2014<\/td>		Dec.
2013<\/td>		Sept.
2013<\/td>		April
2013<\/td>		Feb.
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>52%<\/td>48%<\/td>54%<\/td>41%<\/td>45%<\/td>49%<\/td>49%<\/td>44%<\/td>47%<\/td>50%<\/td>55%<\/td>60%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>46%<\/td>46%<\/td>42%<\/td>54%<\/td>51%<\/td>47%<\/td>47%<\/td>50%<\/td>47%<\/td>41%<\/td>42%<\/td>33%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>2%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

453<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

441<\/em><\/td>712<\/em><\/td>680<\/em><\/td>717<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>470<\/em><\/td>698<\/em><\/td>674<\/em><\/td>694<\/em><\/td>\n

697<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered <\/em>voters – First Term<\/em><\/td>		Dec.
2012<\/td>		April
2012<\/td>		Feb.
2012<\/td>		Oct.
2011<\/td>		Aug.
2011<\/td>		May
2011<\/td>		Sept.
2010<\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td>		Oct.
2009<\/td>		July
2009<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>58%<\/td>54%<\/td>51%<\/td>47%<\/td>52%<\/td>60%<\/td>47%<\/td>51%<\/td>54%<\/td>53%<\/td>54%<\/td>59%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>35%<\/td>41%<\/td>42%<\/td>46%<\/td>39%<\/td>36%<\/td>44%<\/td>42%<\/td>41%<\/td>38%<\/td>33%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>6%<\/td>7%<\/td>9%<\/td>4%<\/td>9%<\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>9%<\/td>14%<\/td>12%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

726<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

692<\/em><\/td>709<\/em><\/td>693<\/em><\/td>730<\/em><\/td>725<\/em><\/td>726<\/em><\/td>747<\/em><\/td>719<\/em><\/td>716<\/em><\/td>785<\/td>\n

792<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[QUESTIONS 3 AND 4 WERE ROTATED<\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3.<\/span> Do you approve or disapprove of the job Bob Menendez is doing as United States Senator?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Approve<\/td>37%<\/strong><\/td>38%<\/td>31%<\/td>47%<\/td>34%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>36%<\/strong><\/td>38%<\/td>21%<\/td>21%<\/td>39%<\/td>55%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td>23%<\/td>48%<\/td>32%<\/td>27%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered <\/em>voters only<\/em><\/td>		July
2015<\/td>		May
2015<\/td>		Feb.
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2014<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Dec.
2013<\/td>		April
2013<\/td>		Feb.
2013<\/td>		April
2012<\/td>		Feb.
2012<\/td>		Oct.
2011<\/td>		Aug.
2011<\/td>		May
2011<\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		Oct.
2008<\/td>		April
2008<\/td>		Jan.
2008<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>38%<\/td>42%<\/td>49%<\/td>45%<\/td>47%<\/td>51%<\/td>49%<\/td>47%<\/td>44%<\/td>41%<\/td>40%<\/td>41%<\/td>43%<\/td>38%<\/td>46%<\/td>38%<\/td>34%<\/td>41%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>38%<\/td>38%<\/td>27%<\/td>30%<\/td>34%<\/td>31%<\/td>30%<\/td>27%<\/td>38%<\/td>31%<\/td>25%<\/td>26%<\/td>29%<\/td>33%<\/td>28%<\/td>33%<\/td>25%<\/td>31%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>23%<\/td>20%<\/td>24%<\/td>26%<\/td>19%<\/td>18%<\/td>21%<\/td>26%<\/td>18%<\/td>28%<\/td>35%<\/td>33%<\/td>28%<\/td>29%<\/td>26%<\/td>29%<\/td>41%<\/td>28%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

453<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

441<\/em><\/td>712<\/em><\/td>680<\/em><\/td>717<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>698<\/em><\/td>694<\/em><\/td>697<\/em><\/td>692<\/em><\/td>709<\/em><\/td>693<\/em><\/td>730<\/em><\/td>725<\/em><\/td>747<\/em><\/td>900<\/em><\/td>720<\/em><\/td>\n

698<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span> Do you approve or disapprove of the job Cory Booker is doing as United States Senator?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>

Yes<\/p><\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>

Rep<\/p><\/td><\/tr>

Approve<\/td>44%<\/strong><\/td>45%<\/td>36%<\/td>60%<\/td>36%<\/td>33%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>22%<\/strong><\/td>24%<\/td>11%<\/td>14%<\/td>27%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>31%<\/td>52%<\/td>27%<\/td>37%<\/td>40%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered <\/em>voters only<\/em><\/td>		July
2015<\/td>		May
2015<\/td>		Feb.
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2014<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Feb.
2014<\/td>		Dec.
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>45%<\/td>51%<\/td>51%<\/td>42%<\/td>48%<\/td>47%<\/td>47%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>24%<\/td>21%<\/td>21%<\/td>23%<\/td>25%<\/td>23%<\/td>20%<\/td>21%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>31%<\/td>27%<\/td>27%<\/td>35%<\/td>27%<\/td>30%<\/td>32%<\/td>43%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

453<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

441<\/em><\/td>712<\/em><\/td>680<\/em><\/td>717<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>690<\/em><\/td>\n

698<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

5.<\/span> Do you think Governor Christie has had major accomplishments, only minor accomplishments, or no real accomplishments in fixing the state\u2019s pension system?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Major accomplishments<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td>11%<\/td>12%<\/td>3%<\/td>11%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr>
Only minor accomplishments<\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>31%<\/td>29%<\/td>23%<\/td>35%<\/td>36%<\/td><\/tr>
No real accomplishments<\/td>47%<\/strong><\/td>48%<\/td>43%<\/td>67%<\/td>44%<\/td>24%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>11%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/td>16%<\/td>7%<\/td>11%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

6.<\/span> Thinking about current state workers, which of the following comes closest to your view\u2026 state workers deserve the pension benefits they have earned no matter the cost, state worker pension benefits are way too high and should be cut, or state worker pension benefits may be too high but we should give them what they were promised? [CHOICES WERE ROTATED]<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

State workers deserve the pension
benefits they have earned no matter the cost<\/td>		31%<\/strong><\/td>30%<\/td>35%<\/td>42%<\/td>28%<\/td>17%<\/td><\/tr>
State worker pension benefits are
way too high and should be cut<\/td>		19%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/td>15%<\/td>5%<\/td>24%<\/td>36%<\/td><\/tr>
State worker pension benefits may be too high
but we should give them what they were promised<\/td>		46%<\/strong><\/td>46%<\/td>48%<\/td>52%<\/td>43%<\/td>44%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>4%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

7.<\/span> Do you approve or disapprove of Governor Christie\u2019s decision to put off making scheduled payments to the state\u2019s pension system, or do you have no opinion on this?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Approve<\/td>12%<\/strong><\/td>13%<\/td>7%<\/td>3%<\/td>13%<\/td>26%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>42%<\/strong><\/td>46%<\/td>17%<\/td>54%<\/td>37%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>46%<\/strong><\/td>40%<\/td>76%<\/td>42%<\/td>50%<\/td>44%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/td>July
2015<\/td>		June
2014<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>12%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>42%<\/td>38%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>46%<\/td>49%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

503<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

800<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

8.<\/span> Now, a question on the health insurance reforms known as the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare. Given what you know or have heard, do you have a generally favorable or generally unfavorable opinion of this program? [Is that a very or somewhat (favorable\/unfavorable) opinion?]<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Very favorable<\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>23%<\/td>28%<\/td>43%<\/td>16%<\/td>5%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat favorable<\/td>26%<\/strong><\/td>26%<\/td>29%<\/td>34%<\/td>25%<\/td>18%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat unfavorable<\/td>16%<\/strong><\/td>15%<\/td>19%<\/td>8%<\/td>21%<\/td>12%<\/td><\/tr>
Very unfavorable<\/td>27%<\/strong><\/td>28%<\/td>21%<\/td>5%<\/td>31%<\/td>58%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>3%<\/td>9%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/td>July
2015<\/td>		Sept.
2014<\/td>		June
2014<\/td>		April
2014<\/td>		Dec.
2013<\/td>		Sept.
2013<\/td><\/tr>
Very favorable<\/td>23%<\/td>17%<\/td>18%<\/td>19%<\/td>16%<\/td>22%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat favorable<\/td>26%<\/td>28%<\/td>24%<\/td>26%<\/td>24%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
Somewhat unfavorable<\/td>16%<\/td>15%<\/td>16%<\/td>17%<\/td>20%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr>
Very unfavorable<\/td>27%<\/td>31%<\/td>36%<\/td>32%<\/td>30%<\/td>27%<\/td><\/tr>
No opinion<\/td>8%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>10%<\/td>16%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

503<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

802<\/em><\/td>800<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>802<\/em><\/td>\n

783<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Question wording of polls prior to Sept. 2014 \u201c<\/em>A question on the health reform bill that was signed into law in 2010, known as the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

9.<\/span> On another issue, do you favor or oppose allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally? [Do you (favor\/oppose) it strongly or somewhat?]<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		\n

PARTY ID<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>\n

Rep<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

Favor, strongly<\/td>48%<\/strong><\/td>46%<\/td>55%<\/td>61%<\/td>44%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
Favor, somewhat<\/td>22%<\/strong><\/td>23%<\/td>17%<\/td>17%<\/td>24%<\/td>31%<\/td><\/tr>
Oppose, somewhat<\/td>4%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr>
Oppose, strongly<\/td>17%<\/strong><\/td>17%<\/td>19%<\/td>14%<\/td>18%<\/td>20%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/strong><\/td>10%<\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>11%<\/td>9%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/em><\/td>July
2015<\/td>		April
2013<\/td>		Feb.
2012<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		Oct.
2007*<\/td>		June
2006*<\/td>		Sept.
2003*<\/td><\/tr>
Favor<\/td>70%<\/td>59%<\/td>52%<\/td>48%<\/td>48%<\/td>50%<\/td>43%<\/td><\/tr>
Oppose<\/td>21%<\/td>31%<\/td>34%<\/td>43%<\/td>45%<\/td>44%<\/td>50%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>9%<\/td>9%<\/td>15%<\/td>10%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>7%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

503<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

806<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>402<\/em><\/td>1002<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>\n

802<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

* Source:  Eagleton-Rutgers Poll<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University Poll<\/em> was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from June 30 to July 1, 2015 with a statewide random sample of 503 adult residents, including 377 contacted via live interview on a landline telephone and 126 via live interview on a cell phone, in English.  Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey questionnaire design, data weighting and analysis.  Final sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information.  Data collection support provided by Braun Research (field) and SSI (RDD sample).  For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points (unadjusted for sample design).  Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below).  In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

35% Dem<\/em><\/td>48% Male<\/em><\/td>28% 18-34<\/em><\/td>\n

63% White<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

45% Ind<\/em><\/td>52% Female<\/em><\/td>38% 35-54<\/em><\/td>\n

13% Black<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

20% Rep<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>34% 55+<\/em><\/td>\n

15% Hispanic<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

      9% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

\n

Registered Voter Sample (weighted)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

36% Dem<\/em><\/td>48% Male<\/em><\/td>21% 18-34<\/em><\/td>\n

65% White<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

43% Ind<\/em><\/td>52% Female<\/em><\/td>42% 35-54<\/em><\/td>\n

13% Black<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

21% Rep<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>36% 55+<\/em><\/td>\n

14% Hispanic<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

      8% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and results by key demographic groups.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gov. Christie seen as accomplishing little on public pensions<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802251239,"template":"","geography":[30],"class_list":["post-40802207509","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-new-jersey"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207509\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802240091,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207509\/revisions\/40802240091"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802251239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802207509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802207509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}