{"id":40802207311,"date":"2011-05-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-18T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_051811\/"},"modified":"2019-06-17T13:03:18","modified_gmt":"2019-06-17T17:03:18","slug":"monmouthpoll_nj_051811","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_051811\/","title":{"rendered":"New Jersey Divided on Governor"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

New Jersey residents are divided on Governor Chris Christie’s job performance and his ratings have dropped since the last Monmouth University\/NJ Press Media Poll<\/em><\/strong>  in February.  He now stands at 47% approve to 49% disapprove among all state residents.  Among registered voters, he has a 46% positive to 49% negative job rating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The change in Christie’s rating comes mainly from the number of people who shifted from having no opinion of the governor a few months ago to holding a negative view today.  In February, 47% of residents held a positive opinion of Christie – identical to the result in the current poll.  However, the number who disapprove has increased by 9 points, while the number who have no opinion of their governor’s job performance decreased by 7 points.  Christie receives positive ratings from 75% of Republicans, 53% of independents, and 22% of Democrats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The state budget looms large in New Jerseyan’s perceptions of Christie.  Nearly 9-in-10 (86%) say they have been following the budget debate, including 33% who have heard a lot about it.  This is slightly lower than the nearly half who closely followed last year’s budget process, but still higher than similar attention levels for the budgets of prior governors.  [ Note:  the poll was conducted before the latest state revenue projections were released.<\/em> ]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This year’s budget has been less controversial than Christie’s inaugural effort, but residents are only slightly more happy with the current spending plan than they were last year.   About 1-in-4 (24%) say they are satisfied with the budget compared to 39% who are dissatisfied.  Another 35% say they can live with the budget proposal even though they are not particularly satisfied with it.  Last spring, 22% of the public was satisfied with the state budget plan and 44% were dissatisfied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Like last year, the public is split on whether the budget is the product of tough, thoughtful choices (45%) or just more of the same old political deals (48%).  Republicans (63%) and independents (53%) are more likely to say Christie’s budget is tough and thoughtful while Democrats (68%) are more likely to see it as political deal making.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Two years of austere budgets may be taking a toll on the governor.  Efforts to sell his reform agenda at town hall meetings generate a lot of media attention, but it appears that New Jerseyans who are paying the most attention to these events have already made up their minds about the governor’s proposals,” said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since taking office, Governor Christie has held many town hall meetings throughout the state to present his reform agenda.  While these events have received national attention for their “YouTube” moments, less than half (46%) of the New Jersey public report having read or heard anything about them.  Among those who have been following the governor’s meet-and-greets, 35% say these forums do a lot to help residents understand what’s going on in Trenton, 30% say they do a little, and 30% say they don’t do much in the terms of informing state residents.  About half of Republicans (49%) say they provide a lot of information while about half of Democrats (48%) say they don’t provide much at all.  Independents are split – 37% say the town halls provide a lot of information and 27% say they provide not much at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The governor’s cuts to aid for municipalities have increased the burden of providing services at the local level.  According to state residents, their local governments have been handling this well.  Most New Jerseyans (55%) say that their municipality has done a good job at keeping spending down in the past year.  This view is held by majorities of Democrats (58%), Republicans (56%), and independents (54%) alike.  Just 35% of state residents say their local government has done a bad job.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

About 6-in-10 residents (59%) are aware that their town is now under a two percent property tax cap.  While some local officials say they will not be able to meet the needs of their constituents under the cap, only 30% of residents are worried that too many essential services will be cut.  Twice as many (62%) believe that their local government will still be able to provide most essential services with the cap in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other poll findings, ratings for the state legislature continue to be negative – just 33% approve of their legislature’s performance while 47% disapprove.  A majority (54%) of residents say things in New Jersey are on the wrong track.  Only 1-in-3 (35%) say the state is headed in the right direction, which is similar to other results over the past five years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University NJ Press Media Poll<\/em>  was conducted by telephone with 807 New Jersey adults from May 12 to 16, 2011.  This sample has a margin of error of \u00b1  3.5 percent.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute and originally published by the New Jersey Press Media newspaper group (Asbury Park Press, Courier-Post, Courier News, Daily Journal, Daily Record, and Home News Tribune).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DATA TABLES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The questions referred to in this release are as follows:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span> Would you say things in New Jersey are going in the right direction, or have they gotten off on the wrong track?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Right direction<\/td> <\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td>34%<\/td>40%<\/td>26%<\/td>36%<\/td>49%<\/td>29%<\/td>37%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Wrong track<\/td> <\/td>54%<\/strong><\/td>55%<\/td>51%<\/td>63%<\/td>53%<\/td>42%<\/td>67%<\/td>50%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Depends<\/td> <\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>8%<\/td>7%<\/td>8%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>1%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

725<\/em><\/td>82<\/em><\/td>227<\/em><\/td>389<\/em><\/td>172<\/em><\/td>228<\/em><\/td>\n

575<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND: All adults<\/td>May
2011<\/td>		Sept.
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		Sept.
2008<\/td>		July
2007<\/td>		April
2007<\/td>		Feb.
2007<\/td>		Sept.
2006<\/td>		July
2006<\/td>		April
2006<\/td>		Sept.
2005<\/td><\/tr>
  Right direction<\/td>35%<\/td>37%<\/td>37%<\/td>29%<\/td>21%<\/td>26%<\/td>39%<\/td>33%<\/td>34%<\/td>29%<\/td>27%<\/td>30%<\/td>31%<\/td><\/tr>
  Wrong track<\/td>54%<\/td>51%<\/td>55%<\/td>56%<\/td>72%<\/td>64%<\/td>50%<\/td>51%<\/td>55%<\/td>58%<\/td>62%<\/td>55%<\/td>54%<\/td><\/tr>
  (VOL) Depends<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td>9%<\/td>5%<\/td><\/tr>
  (VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>3%<\/td>5%<\/td>4%<\/td>9%<\/td>4%<\/td>6%<\/td>6%<\/td>8%<\/td>6%<\/td>7%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>10%<\/td><\/tr>
  Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

801<\/em><\/td>804<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>808<\/em><\/td>800<\/em><\/td>804<\/em><\/td>801<\/em><\/td>800<\/em><\/td>802<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>800<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

2.<\/span> Do you approve or disapprove of the job Chris Christie is doing as governor? [PROBE: Do you approve\/disapprove strongly or somewhat?]<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Strongly approve<\/td> <\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>25%<\/td>12%<\/td>6%<\/td>26%<\/td>45%<\/td>17%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Somewhat approve<\/td> <\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>21%<\/td>36%<\/td>16%<\/td>27%<\/td>30%<\/td>17%<\/td>26%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Somewhat disapprove<\/td> <\/td>18%<\/strong><\/td>16%<\/td>28%<\/td>26%<\/td>17%<\/td>7%<\/td>15%<\/td>19%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Strongly disapprove<\/td> <\/td>31%<\/strong><\/td>33%<\/td>20%<\/td>46%<\/td>24%<\/td>17%<\/td>48%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>5%<\/td>6%<\/td>1%<\/td>2%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

725<\/em><\/td>82<\/em><\/td>227<\/em><\/td>389<\/em><\/td>172<\/em><\/td>228<\/em><\/td>\n

575<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND: All adults<\/em><\/td>May
2011<\/td>		Feb.
2011<\/td>		Sept.
2010<\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>47%<\/td>47%<\/td>45%<\/td>44%<\/td>41%<\/td>33%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>49%<\/td>40%<\/td>38%<\/td>44%<\/td>44%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>5%<\/td>12%<\/td>17%<\/td>12%<\/td>15%<\/td>52%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

801<\/em><\/td>801<\/em><\/td>801<\/em><\/td>804<\/em><\/td>\n

803<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:
Registered voters<\/em><\/td>		May
2011<\/td>		Feb.
2011<\/td>		Sept.
2010<\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>46%<\/td>49%<\/td>44%<\/td>45%<\/td>42%<\/td>31%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>49%<\/td>41%<\/td>40%<\/td>43%<\/td>44%<\/td>15%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>5%<\/td>9%<\/td>16%<\/td>12%<\/td>13%<\/td>53%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

725<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

718<\/em><\/td>726<\/em><\/td>747<\/em><\/td>719<\/em><\/td>\n

716<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

3.<\/span> Do you approve or disapprove of the job the state legislature is doing?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Approve<\/td> <\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>32%<\/td>39%<\/td>36%<\/td>30%<\/td>35%<\/td>25%<\/td>36%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Disapprove<\/td> <\/td>47%<\/strong><\/td>48%<\/td>41%<\/td>43%<\/td>53%<\/td>40%<\/td>53%<\/td>45%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>20%<\/strong><\/td>20%<\/td>20%<\/td>22%<\/td>17%<\/td>25%<\/td>23%<\/td>19%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

725<\/em><\/td>82<\/em><\/td>227<\/em><\/td>389<\/em><\/td>172<\/em><\/td>228<\/em><\/td>\n

575<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND: All Adults<\/em><\/td>May
2011<\/td>		Feb.
2011<\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td>		July
2009<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		Sept.
2008<\/td>		July
2008<\/td>		April
2008<\/td>		March
2008<\/td>		Oct.
2007<\/td>		Feb.
2007<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>33%<\/td>30%<\/td>24%<\/td>20%<\/td>26%<\/td>30%<\/td>25%<\/td>29%<\/td>27%<\/td>29%<\/td>28%<\/td>33%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>47%<\/td>44%<\/td>49%<\/td>56%<\/td>46%<\/td>47%<\/td>52%<\/td>47%<\/td>45%<\/td>53%<\/td>50%<\/td>41%<\/td>40%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>20%<\/td>26%<\/td>27%<\/td>24%<\/td>28%<\/td>23%<\/td>23%<\/td>23%<\/td>28%<\/td>18%<\/td>22%<\/td>26%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

801<\/em><\/td>801<\/em><\/td>804<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>923<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>808<\/td>1004<\/em><\/td>803<\/em><\/td>805<\/em><\/td>801<\/em><\/td>\n

801<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND: Registered Voters<\/em><\/td>May
2011<\/td>		Feb.
2011<\/td>		July
2010<\/td>		April
2010<\/td>		Feb.
2010<\/td>		July
2009<\/td>		Feb.
2009<\/td>		Sept.
2008<\/td>		July
2008<\/td>		April
2008<\/td>		March
2008<\/td>		Oct.
2007<\/td>		Feb.
2007<\/td><\/tr>
Approve<\/td>32%<\/td>29%<\/td>25%<\/td>19%<\/td>24%<\/td>31%<\/td>23%<\/td>29%<\/td>27%<\/td>28%<\/td>25%<\/td>32%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
Disapprove<\/td>48%<\/td>45%<\/td>49%<\/td>57%<\/td>49%<\/td>48%<\/td>55%<\/td>50%<\/td>47%<\/td>55%<\/td>53%<\/td>43%<\/td>42%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>20%<\/td>26%<\/td>26%<\/td>24%<\/td>27%<\/td>22%<\/td>22%<\/td>21%<\/td>26%<\/td>17%<\/td>22%<\/td>25%<\/td>23%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

725<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

718<\/em><\/td>747<\/em><\/td>719<\/em><\/td>716<\/em><\/td>792<\/em><\/td>721<\/td>709<\/em><\/td>889<\/em><\/td>720<\/em><\/td>719<\/em><\/td>688<\/em><\/td>\n

681<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span> Thinking about Chris Christie\u2019s term as governor so far, would you say that he has major accomplishments, minor accomplishments, or no real accomplishments to point to?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Major accomplishments<\/td> <\/td>23%<\/strong><\/td>25%<\/td>17%<\/td>8%<\/td>26%<\/td>45%<\/td>21%<\/td>24%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Minor accomplishments<\/td> <\/td>40%<\/strong><\/td>39%<\/td>46%<\/td>41%<\/td>40%<\/td>36%<\/td>32%<\/td>42%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>No real accomplishments<\/td> <\/td>34%<\/strong><\/td>35%<\/td>32%<\/td>49%<\/td>31%<\/td>18%<\/td>47%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>2%<\/strong><\/td>2%<\/td>5%<\/td>2%<\/td>3%<\/td>1%<\/td>0%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

725<\/em><\/td>82<\/em><\/td>227<\/em><\/td>389<\/em><\/td>172<\/em><\/td>228<\/em><\/td>\n

575<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/td>May
2011<\/td>		Feb.
2011<\/td><\/tr>
Major accomplishments<\/td>23%<\/td>25%<\/td><\/tr>
Minor accomplishments<\/td>40%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
No real accomplishments<\/td>34%<\/td>34%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td>2%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

801<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

5.<\/span> How much have you heard or read about Governor Christie\u2019s state budget plan \u2013 a lot, a little, or nothing at all?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>A lot<\/td> <\/td>33%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/td>17%<\/td>32%<\/td>31%<\/td>39%<\/td>46%<\/td>29%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>A little<\/td> <\/td>53%<\/strong><\/td>52%<\/td>57%<\/td>52%<\/td>55%<\/td>52%<\/td>41%<\/td>57%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Nothing at all<\/td> <\/td>13%<\/strong><\/td>11%<\/td>25%<\/td>16%<\/td>14%<\/td>9%<\/td>12%<\/td>13%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

725<\/em><\/td>82<\/em><\/td>227<\/em><\/td>389<\/em><\/td>172<\/em><\/td>228<\/em><\/td>575<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/td>May
2011<\/td>		April
2010<\/td><\/tr>
A lot<\/td>33%<\/td>45%<\/td><\/tr>
A little<\/td>53%<\/td>44%<\/td><\/tr>
Nothing at all<\/td>13%<\/td>11%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

804<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[NOTE:<\/em> QUESTIONS<\/em> 6 AND 7 WERE<\/em> ASKED ONLY OF THOSE WHO HEARD \u201cA LOT\u201d OR \u201cA LITTLE\u201d ABOUT THE GOVERNOR\u2019S BUDGET PLAN<\/em>: moe = \u00b1<\/strong> 3.7%<\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6.<\/span> How would you describe your reaction to the governor\u2019s budget plan \u2013 would you say you are satisfied with it, not particularly satisfied but you can live with it, or you are definitely dissatisfied with it?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>PUBLIC
WORKER<\/td>		\n

BUDGET
AWARENESS<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>No<\/td>Lot<\/td>\n

Little<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Satisfied<\/td> <\/td>24%<\/strong><\/td>24%<\/td>24%<\/td>8%<\/td>24%<\/td>48%<\/td>18%<\/td>25%<\/td>30%<\/td>20%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Can live with it<\/td> <\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td>33%<\/td>47%<\/td>31%<\/td>40%<\/td>30%<\/td>23%<\/td>39%<\/td>24%<\/td>42%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Dissatisfied<\/td> <\/td>39%<\/strong><\/td>40%<\/td>27%<\/td>61%<\/td>32%<\/td>18%<\/td>55%<\/td>33%<\/td>45%<\/td>35%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td>1%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

721<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

657<\/em><\/td>64<\/em><\/td>198<\/em><\/td>347<\/em><\/td>159<\/em><\/td>209<\/em><\/td>509<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>\n

412<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/td>May
2011<\/td>		April
2010<\/td><\/tr>
Satisfied<\/td>24%<\/td>22%<\/td><\/tr>
Can live with it<\/td>35%<\/td>32%<\/td><\/tr>
Dissatisfied<\/td>39%<\/td>44%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don’t know<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

721<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

738<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

7.<\/span> In general, would you describe the governor\u2019s budget plan as: the product of tough, thoughtful choices – OR – more of the same old political dealings? [ITEMS WERE ROTATED]<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>PUBLIC
WORKER<\/td>		\n

BUDGET
AWARENESS<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>No<\/td>Lot<\/td>\n

Little<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Tough, thoughtful choices<\/td> <\/td>45%<\/strong><\/td>46%<\/td>35%<\/td>23%<\/td>53%<\/td>63%<\/td>40%<\/td>46%<\/td>45%<\/td>44%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Same old political dealings<\/td> <\/td>48%<\/strong><\/td>46%<\/td>60%<\/td>68%<\/td>40%<\/td>32%<\/td>52%<\/td>47%<\/td>46%<\/td>49%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Some of both<\/td> <\/td>4%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>3%<\/strong><\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td>2%<\/td>5%<\/td>3%<\/td>4%<\/td>3%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

721<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

657<\/em><\/td>64<\/em><\/td>198<\/em><\/td>347<\/em><\/td>159<\/em><\/td>209<\/em><\/td>509<\/em><\/td>309<\/em><\/td>\n

412<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
TREND:<\/td>May
2011<\/td>		April
2010<\/td><\/tr>
Tough, thoughtful choices<\/td>45%<\/td>46%<\/td><\/tr>
Same old political dealings<\/td>48%<\/td>46%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Some of both<\/td>4%<\/td>2%<\/td><\/tr>
(VOL) Don\u2019t Know<\/td>3%<\/td>6%<\/td><\/tr>
Unwtd N<\/em><\/td>\n

721<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>

\n

738<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

8.<\/span> Governor Christie has been holding town hall meetings with residents throughout the state to discuss his policies. Have you read or heard anything about these meetings, or not?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Yes, heard of<\/td> <\/td>46%<\/strong><\/td>51%<\/td>18%<\/td>36%<\/td>49%<\/td>54%<\/td>60%<\/td>41%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>No, not aware<\/td> <\/td>54%<\/strong><\/td>49%<\/td>82%<\/td>64%<\/td>51%<\/td>46%<\/td>40%<\/td>59%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

725<\/em><\/td>82<\/em><\/td>227<\/em><\/td>389<\/em><\/td>172<\/em><\/td>228<\/em><\/td>\n

575<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

 [The following question was asked only of those who said \u201c<\/em><\/strong>Yes, heard of\u201d to Q8,<\/strong><\/em> moe= \u00b1<\/em> 4.6%<\/em>]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

9.<\/span> Do you think these town hall meetings do a lot, a little, or not much at all in helping residents understand what\u2019s going on in Trenton?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>A lot<\/td> <\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td>36%<\/td>25%<\/td>21%<\/td>37%<\/td>49%<\/td>26%<\/td>39%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>A little<\/td> <\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td>28%<\/td>59%<\/td>27%<\/td>30%<\/td>36%<\/td>31%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Not much at all<\/td> <\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td>31%<\/td>8%<\/td>48%<\/td>27%<\/td>13%<\/td>37%<\/td>26%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>5%<\/strong><\/td>5%<\/td>8%<\/td>4%<\/td>6%<\/td>2%<\/td>6%<\/td>4%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

460<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

435<\/em><\/td>25<\/em><\/td>113<\/em><\/td>233<\/em><\/td>101<\/em><\/td>158<\/em><\/td>\n

300<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

10.<\/span> Turning to your own town or city \u2013 Do you think your local government has done a good job or bad job at keeping spending down in the past year?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Good job<\/td> <\/td>55%<\/strong><\/td>56%<\/td>48%<\/td>58%<\/td>54%<\/td>56%<\/td>60%<\/td>54%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Bad job<\/td> <\/td>35%<\/strong><\/td>34%<\/td>41%<\/td>28%<\/td>39%<\/td>37%<\/td>28%<\/td>38%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>10%<\/strong><\/td>9%<\/td>10%<\/td>14%<\/td>7%<\/td>6%<\/td>12%<\/td>9%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>807<\/em><\/strong><\/td>725<\/em><\/td>82<\/em><\/td>227<\/em><\/td>389<\/em><\/td>172<\/em><\/td>228<\/em><\/td>575<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

11.<\/span> Have you heard about a statewide property tax cap that limits local government to increasing property tax collections by no more than two percent each year, or were you not aware of this?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Yes, heard of<\/td> <\/td>59%<\/strong><\/td>63%<\/td>36%<\/td>48%<\/td>62%<\/td>67%<\/td>73%<\/td>54%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>No, not aware<\/td> <\/td>41%<\/strong><\/td>37%<\/td>60%<\/td>51%<\/td>36%<\/td>33%<\/td>26%<\/td>45%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>1%<\/strong><\/td>0%<\/td>4%<\/td>0%<\/td>2%<\/td>0%<\/td>1%<\/td>1%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

807<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

725<\/em><\/td>82<\/em><\/td>227<\/em><\/td>389<\/em><\/td>172<\/em><\/td>228<\/em><\/td>\n

575<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[The following question was asked only of those who said \u201c<\/em><\/strong>Yes, heard of\u201d to Q11,<\/strong><\/em> moe= \u00b1<\/em> 4.1%<\/em>]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

12.<\/span> Do you think that with the two percent property tax cap, your local government will still be able to provide most essential services or that too many essential services will be cut?<\/span><\/p>\n
 <\/td>\n

TOTAL<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

REGISTERED
VOTER<\/td>		PARTY ID<\/td>\n

PUBLIC
WORKER<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td> <\/strong><\/td>\n

Yes<\/p>\n<\/td>

No<\/td>Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td>Yes<\/td>\n

No<\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Still able to provide most essential services<\/td> <\/td>62%<\/strong><\/td>64%<\/td>36%<\/td>46%<\/td>68%<\/td>71%<\/td>61%<\/td>62%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Too many essential services will be cut<\/td> <\/td>30%<\/strong><\/td>29%<\/td>45%<\/td>42%<\/td>25%<\/td>24%<\/td>32%<\/td>30%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>(VOL) Don\u2019t know<\/td> <\/td>8%<\/strong><\/td>7%<\/td>18%<\/td>12%<\/td>7%<\/td>5%<\/td>7%<\/td>8%<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/em><\/td>Unwtd N<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

562<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>

522<\/em><\/td>40<\/em><\/td>135<\/em><\/td>288<\/em><\/td>124<\/em><\/td>177<\/em><\/td>\n

383<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University\/NJ Press Media Poll<\/em> was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute on May 12 to 16, 2011 with a statewide random sample of 807 adult residents.  Sampling and live telephone interviewing services were provided by Braun Research, Inc.  For results based on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.  Sampling error increases as the sample size decreases, so statements based on various population subgroups, such as separate figures reported by gender or party identification, are subject to more error than are statements based on the total sample.  In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

POLL DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

35% Dem<\/em><\/td>48% Male<\/em><\/td>27% 18-34<\/em><\/td>\n

66% White<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

21% Rep<\/em><\/td>52% Female<\/em><\/td>40% 35-54<\/em><\/td>\n

12% Black<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

44% Ind<\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>33% 55+<\/em><\/td>\n

14% Hispanic<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td> <\/em><\/td>\n

  8% Asian\/Other<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

It is the Monmouth University Polling Institute\u2019s policy to conduct surveys of all adult New Jersey residents, including voters and non-voters, on issues that affect the state.  Specific voter surveys are conducted when appropriate during election cycles.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and results by key demographic groups.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Fewer than half aware of town hall meetings<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802251239,"template":"","geography":[30],"class_list":["post-40802207311","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-new-jersey"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207311\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802241797,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207311\/revisions\/40802241797"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802251239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802207311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802207311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}