{"id":40802207286,"date":"2009-03-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-24T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_032409\/"},"modified":"2019-07-22T11:13:04","modified_gmt":"2019-07-22T15:13:04","slug":"monmouthpoll_nj_032409","status":"publish","type":"poll","link":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/reports\/monmouthpoll_nj_032409\/","title":{"rendered":"New Jersey on Illegal Immigrant Policy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

After more than a year of hearings and deliberations, the Governor’s Blue Ribbon Advisory Panel on Immigrant Policy delivered its final report to Jon Corzine’s desk last month.  The report has not yet been made public, but the panel is reported to have considered recommendations to offer limited driver’s licenses and in-state college tuition to undocumented immigrants living in New Jersey.  While the final status of those recommendations is unknown, the latest Monmouth University\/Gannett New Jersey Poll<\/em>  <\/strong> finds little public support for either proposal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More than 6-in-10 New Jersey residents (62%) oppose offering illegal immigrants some type of limited driver’s license.  Just 33% favor this proposal.  The poll also found that proponents’ arguments for offering such licenses would probably have little impact on moving public opinion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Poll respondents who registered initial opposition were told that “some people say issuing limited licenses to illegal immigrants would allow them to keep jobs that legal citizens don’t want to do and would make the state safer by bringing them into the system.”  Only 1-in-10 (11%) opponents say these arguments would make them any more likely to favor the driver’s license proposal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similarly, few New Jerseyans would favor extending in-state college tuition rates to undocumented immigrants living in the state.  Only 20% favor this proposal, compared to 37% who say illegal immigrants should pay higher out-of-state rates.  However, a sizable number (39%) say that illegal immigrants should not even be allowed to attend New Jersey’s public colleges and universities at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The children of illegal immigrants fare a little better in public opinion on this policy.  Just 32% of New Jerseyans would extend in-state tuition to the children of undocumented immigrants living in the state, 39% would charge them out-of-state rates and 22% would bar them from attending state colleges altogether.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“These results suggest there is a sizable uphill battle to win<\/ins> support for these ideas.  The general public, which has not really been engaged in the debate on these proposals, is inclined to reject them out of hand,” said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The poll also found that 51% of state residents consider illegal immigration to be a very serious problem in New Jersey and another 28% call it somewhat serious.  Only 18% say the issue is not serious for the state.  The number calling the issue very serious is up by a few percentage points from a poll taken in September 2007 (47%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Republicans (64%) are among those most likely to say the issue is a very serious problem in New Jersey.  This compares to 52% of independents and 44% of Democrats who hold the same opinion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University\/Gannett New Jersey Poll<\/em>  was conducted by telephone with 803 New Jersey adults February 2-8, 2009.  This sample has a margin of error of \u00b1  3.5 percent.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute and originally published by the Gannett New Jersey newspaper group (Asbury Park Press, Courier-Post, Courier News, Daily Journal, Daily Record, and Home News Tribune).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DATA TABLES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The\nquestions referred to in this release are as follows:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(* Some columns may not\nadd to 100% due to rounding.)<\/em> <\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/span> How serious a problem do you think the issue of illegal immigration is for New Jersey right now \u2013 very, somewhat, not too, or not at all serious?<\/span><\/p>\n
\n  \n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/strong>\n <\/td>Reg. <\/em>
Voter<\/em> <\/td>		\n PARTY ID\n <\/td>\n AGE\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n  \n <\/td>\n Dem\n <\/td>\n Ind\n <\/td>\n Rep\n <\/td>\n 18-34\n <\/td>\n 35-54\n <\/td>\n 55+\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Very serious\n <\/td>\n 51%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 53%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 44%\n <\/td>\n 52%\n <\/td>\n 64%\n <\/td>\n 43%\n <\/td>\n 48%\n <\/td>\n 62%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Somewhat serious\n <\/td>\n 28%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 27%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 29%\n <\/td>\n 25%\n <\/td>\n 26%\n <\/td>\n 28%\n <\/td>\n 30%\n <\/td>\n 24%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Not too serious\n <\/td>\n 10%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 10%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 15%\n <\/td>\n 8%\n <\/td>\n 5%\n <\/td>\n 11%\n <\/td>\n 12%\n <\/td>\n 7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Not at all serious\n <\/td>\n 8%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 6%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 8%\n <\/td>\n 10%\n <\/td>\n 5%\n <\/td>\n 16%\n <\/td>\n 5%\n <\/td>\n 4%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n (VOL) Don\u2019t know\n <\/td>\n 4%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 3%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 3%\n <\/td>\n 6%\n <\/td>\n 1%\n <\/td>\n 2%\n <\/td>\n 4%\n <\/td>\n 4%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Unwtd N<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 803<\/em><\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 721<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 261<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 309<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 178<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 106<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 312<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 368<\/em>\n <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n
\n TREND:<\/em>\n <\/td>Feb.
09<\/td>		Sept.
07<\/td>		July
07<\/td><\/tr>
\n Very serious\n <\/td>\n 51%\n <\/td>\n 47%\n <\/td>\n 46%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Somewhat serious\n <\/td>\n 28%\n <\/td>\n 33%\n <\/td>\n 30%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Not too serious\n <\/td>\n 10%\n <\/td>\n 11%\n <\/td>\n 16%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Not at all serious\n <\/td>\n 8%\n <\/td>\n 6%\n <\/td>\n 6%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n (VOL) Don\u2019t know\n <\/td>\n 4%\n <\/td>\n 3%\n <\/td>\n 2%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Unwtd N<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 803<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 801<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 408<\/em>\n <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Questions\n2 and 3 were asked of separate random half-samples: moe = +<\/em><\/strong> 4.9%<\/em>]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2\/3.<\/span> Do you think that [READ ITEM] should be allowed to\nattend a state college at the same reduced tuition rate as other New Jersey\nresidents, should they pay the higher out-of-state tuition rate, or should they\nnot be allowed to attend state colleges at all?<\/strong>
<\/span><\/p>\n

Illegal immigrants living in New Jersey <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n  \n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/strong>\n <\/td> Reg. <\/em>
Voter<\/em> <\/td>		Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><\/tr>
\n Reduced\n in-state tuition\n <\/td>\n 20%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 20%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 25%\n <\/td>\n 15%\n <\/td>\n 18%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Higher\n out-of-state \n <\/td>\n 37%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 38%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 47%\n <\/td>\n 36%\n <\/td>\n 23%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Not allowed to attend\n <\/td>\n 39%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 39%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 27%\n <\/td>\n 45%\n <\/td>\n 54%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n (VOL) Don\u2019t know\n <\/td>\n 4%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 3%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 1%\n <\/td>\n 4%\n <\/td>\n 5%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Unwtd N<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 401<\/em><\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 363<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 131<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 157<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 87<\/em>\n <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

The children of illegal immigrants in New Jersey<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n  \n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/strong>\n <\/td>Reg.<\/em>
Voter<\/em><\/td>		Dem<\/td>Ind<\/td>Rep<\/td><\/tr>
\n Reduced\n in-state tuition\n <\/td>\n 32%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 33%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 41%\n <\/td>\n 31%\n <\/td>\n 20%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Higher\n out-of-state \n <\/td>\n 39%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 40%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 39%\n <\/td>\n 38%\n <\/td>\n 43%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Not allowed to attend\n <\/td>\n 22%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 23%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 15%\n <\/td>\n 24%\n <\/td>\n 34%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n (VOL) Don\u2019t know\n <\/td>\n 6%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 5%<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 5%\n <\/td>\n 8%\n <\/td>\n 3%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Unwtd N<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 402<\/em><\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 358<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 130<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 152<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 91<\/em>\n <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

4.<\/span> Do you favor or oppose allowing illegal immigrants to get some type of limited driver\u2019s license?<\/span><\/p>\n
\n  \n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/strong>\n <\/td> Reg.<\/em>
Voter<\/em> <\/td>		\n PARTY ID\n <\/td>\n AGE\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n  \n <\/td>\n Dem\n <\/td>\n Ind\n <\/td>\n Rep\n <\/td>\n 18-34\n <\/td>\n 35-54\n <\/td>\n 55+\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Favor\n <\/td>\n 33%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 33%\n <\/td>\n 39%\n <\/td>\n 29%\n <\/td>\n 27%\n <\/td>\n 36%\n <\/td>\n 34%\n <\/td>\n 31%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Oppose\n <\/td>\n 62%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 62%\n <\/td>\n 59%\n <\/td>\n 64%\n <\/td>\n 69%\n <\/td>\n 61%\n <\/td>\n 60%\n <\/td>\n 65%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n (VOL) Don\u2019t know\n <\/td>\n 5%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 5%\n <\/td>\n 3%\n <\/td>\n 7%\n <\/td>\n 4%\n <\/td>\n 3%\n <\/td>\n 6%\n <\/td>\n 4%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Unwtd N<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 803<\/em><\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 721<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 261<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 309<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 178<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 106<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 312<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 368<\/em>\n <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

[The following question was asked of those\nwho said \u201cOppose\u201d to Q4,<\/em> moe = +\n4.4%]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

5.<\/span> Some people say that issuing limited licenses to illegal immigrants would allow them to keep jobs that legal citizens don\u2019t want to do and would make the state safer by bringing them into the system.\u00a0 Does hearing this argument make you more likely to favor allowing illegal immigrants to get a limited driver\u2019s license, or doesn\u2019t it really change your mind?<\/span><\/p>\n
\n Among those opposed:<\/em><\/strong>\n <\/td>\n TOTAL<\/strong>\n <\/td>Reg. <\/em>
Voter<\/em> <\/td>		\n PARTY ID\n <\/td>\n AGE\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Dem\n <\/td>\n Ind\n <\/td>\n Rep\n <\/td>\n 18-34\n <\/td>\n 35-54\n <\/td>\n 55+\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n More likely to favor\n <\/td>\n 11%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 11%\n <\/td>\n 18%\n <\/td>\n 8%\n <\/td>\n 6%\n <\/td>\n 13%\n <\/td>\n 11%\n <\/td>\n 8%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Doesn\u2019t change mind\n <\/td>\n 81%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 82%\n <\/td>\n 76%\n <\/td>\n 82%\n <\/td>\n 87%\n <\/td>\n 82%\n <\/td>\n 80%\n <\/td>\n 83%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n (VOL) Even LESS likely\n <\/td>\n 7%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 6%\n <\/td>\n 4%\n <\/td>\n 9%\n <\/td>\n 6%\n <\/td>\n 5%\n <\/td>\n 6%\n <\/td>\n 8%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n (VOL) Don\u2019t know\n <\/td>\n 2%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 2%\n <\/td>\n 2%\n <\/td>\n 1%\n <\/td>\n 2%\n <\/td>\n 0%\n <\/td>\n 3%\n <\/td>\n 1%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Unwtd N<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 507<\/em><\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 458<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 145<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 198<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 131<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 66<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 194<\/em>\n <\/td>\n 234<\/em>\n <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Monmouth University\/Gannett New Jersey Poll<\/em> was conducted and analyzed by the Monmouth University Polling Institute research staff.  The telephone interviews were collected by Braun Research on February 2-8, 2009 with a statewide random sample of 803 New Jersey adults. For results based on this voter sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.  Sampling error increases as the sample size decreases, so statements based on various population subgroups, such as separate figures reported by gender or party identification, are subject to more error than are statements based on the total sample.  In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is the Monmouth University Polling Institute\u2019s policy to conduct surveys of all adult New Jersey residents, including voters and non-voters, on issues which affect the state.  Specific voter surveys are conducted when appropriate during election cycles.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click on pdf file link below for full methodology and results by key demographic groups.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Public says no to driver\u2019s licenses and in-state tuition<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":40802251239,"template":"","geography":[30],"class_list":["post-40802207286","poll","type-poll","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","geography-new-jersey"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/poll"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207286\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40802242838,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/poll\/40802207286\/revisions\/40802242838"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40802251239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40802207286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"geography","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monmouth.edu\/polling-institute\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geography?post=40802207286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}